TY - JOUR
T1 - Experiment-guided thermodynamic simulations on reversible two-state proteins
T2 - Implications for protein thermostability
AU - Kumar, Sandeep
AU - Nussinov, Ruth
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Dr. Neeti Sinha, Dr. Chung-Jung Tsai, Dr. K. Gunasekaran, Dr. David Zanuy and, in particular, Dr. Jacob V. Maizel for numerous helpful discussions. The research of R. Nussinov in Israel has been supported in part by the “Center of Excellence in Geometric Computing and its Applications” funded by the Israel Science Foundation, by the Ministry of Science grant and by the Tel Aviv University Basic Research grants. This project has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract number NO1-CO-12400. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the view or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organization imply endorsement by the U.S. government.
PY - 2004/11/1
Y1 - 2004/11/1
N2 - Here, we perform protein thermodynamic simulations within a set of boundary conditions, effectively blanketing the experimental data. The thermodynamic parameters, melting temperature (TG), enthalpy change at the melting temperature (ΔHG) and heat capacity change (ΔC p) were systematically varied over the experimentally observed ranges for small single domain reversible two-state proteins. Parameter sets that satisfy the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation and yield a temperature of maximal stability (TS) around room temperature were selected. The results were divided into three categories by arbitrarily chosen TG ranges. The TG ranges in these categories correspond to typical values of the melting temperatures observed for the majority of the proteins from mesophilic, thermophilic and hyperthermophilic organisms. As expected, ΔCp values tend to be high in mesophiles and low in hyperthermophiles. An increase in TG is accompanied by an up-shift and broadening of the protein stability curves, however, with a large scatter. Furthermore, the simulations reveal that the average ΔHG increases with TG up to ∼360 K and becomes constant thereafter. ΔCp decreases with TG with different rates before and after ∼360 K. This provides further justification for the separate grouping of proteins into thermophiles and hyperthermophiles to assess their thermodynamic differences. This analysis of the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation has allowed us to study the interdependence of the thermodynamic parameters TG, ΔHG and ΔCp and their derivatives in a more rigorous way than possible by the limited experimental protein thermodynamics data available in the literature. The results provide new insights into protein thermostability and suggest potential strategies for its manipulation.
AB - Here, we perform protein thermodynamic simulations within a set of boundary conditions, effectively blanketing the experimental data. The thermodynamic parameters, melting temperature (TG), enthalpy change at the melting temperature (ΔHG) and heat capacity change (ΔC p) were systematically varied over the experimentally observed ranges for small single domain reversible two-state proteins. Parameter sets that satisfy the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation and yield a temperature of maximal stability (TS) around room temperature were selected. The results were divided into three categories by arbitrarily chosen TG ranges. The TG ranges in these categories correspond to typical values of the melting temperatures observed for the majority of the proteins from mesophilic, thermophilic and hyperthermophilic organisms. As expected, ΔCp values tend to be high in mesophiles and low in hyperthermophiles. An increase in TG is accompanied by an up-shift and broadening of the protein stability curves, however, with a large scatter. Furthermore, the simulations reveal that the average ΔHG increases with TG up to ∼360 K and becomes constant thereafter. ΔCp decreases with TG with different rates before and after ∼360 K. This provides further justification for the separate grouping of proteins into thermophiles and hyperthermophiles to assess their thermodynamic differences. This analysis of the Gibbs-Helmholtz equation has allowed us to study the interdependence of the thermodynamic parameters TG, ΔHG and ΔCp and their derivatives in a more rigorous way than possible by the limited experimental protein thermodynamics data available in the literature. The results provide new insights into protein thermostability and suggest potential strategies for its manipulation.
KW - Heat capacity
KW - Hyperthermophiles
KW - Melting temperature
KW - Stability
KW - T
KW - T
KW - Thermodynamic simulations
KW - Thermodynamics
KW - Thermophiles
KW - T′
KW - cold denaturation temperature
KW - heat denaturation (melting) temperature
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/6344265180
U2 - 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.06.005
DO - 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.06.005
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 15501567
AN - SCOPUS:6344265180
SN - 0301-4622
VL - 111
SP - 235
EP - 246
JO - Biophysical Chemistry
JF - Biophysical Chemistry
IS - 3
ER -