TY - JOUR
T1 - Expectant management of preterm premature rupture of membranes
T2 - Is it all about gestational age?
AU - Melamed, Nir
AU - Ben-Haroush, Avi
AU - Pardo, Joseph
AU - Chen, Rony
AU - Hadar, Eran
AU - Hod, Moshe
AU - Yogev, Yariv
PY - 2011/1
Y1 - 2011/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare neonatal outcome in cases of uncomplicated preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (ie, no evidence of clinical chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, or fetal distress) with that of spontaneous preterm deliveries (PTDs) and to determine the effect of the latency period. STUDY DESIGN: The study group included women with PPROM at gestational age 280/7-336/7 weeks (n = 488). Neonatal outcome was compared with a matched control group of women with spontaneous PTD (n = 1464). RESULTS: Neonates in the uncomplicated PPROM group were at increased risk for composite adverse outcome (53.7% vs 42.0%; P < .001), mortality (1.6% vs 0.0%; P < .001), respiratory morbidity (32.8% vs 26.4%; P = .006), necrotizing enterocolitis, jaundice, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and polycythemia. Neonatal adverse outcome was more likely in cases of latency period >7 days, oligohydramnios, male fetus, and nulliparity. CONCLUSION: Consultation regarding prematurity-related morbidity in infants exposed to uncomplicated PPROM cannot be extrapolated from PTDs and should be stratified by the duration of the latency period and the other risk factors identified in the current study.
AB - OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare neonatal outcome in cases of uncomplicated preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (ie, no evidence of clinical chorioamnionitis, placental abruption, or fetal distress) with that of spontaneous preterm deliveries (PTDs) and to determine the effect of the latency period. STUDY DESIGN: The study group included women with PPROM at gestational age 280/7-336/7 weeks (n = 488). Neonatal outcome was compared with a matched control group of women with spontaneous PTD (n = 1464). RESULTS: Neonates in the uncomplicated PPROM group were at increased risk for composite adverse outcome (53.7% vs 42.0%; P < .001), mortality (1.6% vs 0.0%; P < .001), respiratory morbidity (32.8% vs 26.4%; P = .006), necrotizing enterocolitis, jaundice, hypoglycemia, hypothermia, and polycythemia. Neonatal adverse outcome was more likely in cases of latency period >7 days, oligohydramnios, male fetus, and nulliparity. CONCLUSION: Consultation regarding prematurity-related morbidity in infants exposed to uncomplicated PPROM cannot be extrapolated from PTDs and should be stratified by the duration of the latency period and the other risk factors identified in the current study.
KW - latency
KW - neonatal
KW - outcome
KW - preterm premature rupture of membranes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650687316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.021
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.021
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:78650687316
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 204
SP - 48.e1-48.e8
JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IS - 1
ER -