TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating Lower Limb Kinematics Using Microsoft’s Kinect
T2 - A Simple, Novel Method
AU - Haimovich, Yaron
AU - Hershkovich, Oded
AU - Portnoy, Sigal
AU - Schwartz, Isabella
AU - Lotan, Raphael
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, University of Toronto Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the Microsoft Kinect sensor (MKS) as a markerless system for motion capture and analysis of lower limb motion, compare it with a state-of-the-art marker-based system (MBS), and investigate its accuracy in simultaneously capturing several lower limb joint movements on several planes while participants walked freely. Method: Participants were asked to walk while gait data were simultaneously recorded by both the MKS and the MBS. Software for analysing the Kinect data stream was developed using Microsoft Visual Studio and Kinect for Windows software development kits. Visual three-dimensional (3D) C-Motion software was used to calculate 3D joint angles of the MBS. Deviation of the joint angles calculated by the two systems was calculated using root-mean-square error (RMSE) on the basis of a designated formula. Results: The calculated RMSE average was <5° between the two systems, a level of difference that has practically no clinical significance. Conclusions: Quantitative measurements of the joint angles of the knee and hip can be acquired using one MKS with some accuracy. The system can be advantageous for clinical use, at the pre-and post-treatment stages of rehabilitation, at significantly lower costs. Further evaluation of the MKS should be performed with larger study populations.
AB - Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the Microsoft Kinect sensor (MKS) as a markerless system for motion capture and analysis of lower limb motion, compare it with a state-of-the-art marker-based system (MBS), and investigate its accuracy in simultaneously capturing several lower limb joint movements on several planes while participants walked freely. Method: Participants were asked to walk while gait data were simultaneously recorded by both the MKS and the MBS. Software for analysing the Kinect data stream was developed using Microsoft Visual Studio and Kinect for Windows software development kits. Visual three-dimensional (3D) C-Motion software was used to calculate 3D joint angles of the MBS. Deviation of the joint angles calculated by the two systems was calculated using root-mean-square error (RMSE) on the basis of a designated formula. Results: The calculated RMSE average was <5° between the two systems, a level of difference that has practically no clinical significance. Conclusions: Quantitative measurements of the joint angles of the knee and hip can be acquired using one MKS with some accuracy. The system can be advantageous for clinical use, at the pre-and post-treatment stages of rehabilitation, at significantly lower costs. Further evaluation of the MKS should be performed with larger study populations.
KW - biomechanical phenomena
KW - gait
KW - lower limb
KW - motion
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147690870
U2 - 10.3138/ptc-2020-0051
DO - 10.3138/ptc-2020-0051
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85147690870
SN - 0300-0508
VL - 73
SP - 391
EP - 400
JO - Physiotherapy Canada
JF - Physiotherapy Canada
IS - 4
ER -