Evaluating active travel: Decision-making for the sustainable city

James MacMillen*, Moshe Givoni, David Banister

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

It is now widely recognized that 'active travel' - the collective term for walking and cycling - confers a multitude of individual and societal benefits that are qualitatively different from those generated by motorized transport. Regular pedestrians and cyclists can expect to enjoy potential health benefits, while modal shift to active travel can lead to considerable environmental improvements at a broad range of spatial scales. However, given the need to ensure high-quality decision-making in the transport sector, it is paramount that contemporary evaluation practices keep pace with the shifting nature of policies that explicitly encourage uptake of walking and cycling. Drawing on a numerical example, this paper examines the extent to which the United Kingdom Department for Transport's evaluation framework - NATA - is sufficiently capable of determining the likely value of investments in active travel, and hence whether there is confidence that policy-makers are adequately placed to make informed choices between alternative investments. It is argued that while the overarching logic to evaluating active travel remains relatively sound, changes must be made to the framework if a genuine transition to sustainable urban mobility is to occur.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)519-536
Number of pages18
JournalBuilt Environment
Volume36
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilEP/G000468/1

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluating active travel: Decision-making for the sustainable city'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this