TY - JOUR
T1 - European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) recommendations for the use of high-resolution manometry of the esophagus
AU - the ESNM HRM consensus group
AU - Tack, Jan
AU - Pauwels, Ans
AU - Roman, Sabine
AU - Savarino, Edoardo
AU - Smout, André
AU - Akyuz, Filiz
AU - Bancila, Ion
AU - Barrias, Silvia
AU - Bor, Serhat
AU - Borovicka, Jan
AU - Bredenoord, Albert J.
AU - Brochard, Charlene
AU - Buckley, Martin
AU - Carter, Dan
AU - Ciriza de los Rios, Constanca
AU - Conchillo, Jose
AU - De Bortoli, Nicola
AU - De Schepper, Heiko
AU - Dickman, Ram
AU - Dumatriscu, Dan
AU - Hatlebakk, Jan
AU - Hoff, Dag Arne
AU - Jurcic, Dragan
AU - Keller, Jutta
AU - Novais, Luis
AU - Pehl, Christian
AU - Penagini, Roberto
AU - Rommel, Nathalie
AU - Ron, Yishai
AU - Vaquero, Cecilio Santander
AU - Sifrim, Daniel
AU - Souto, Paulo
AU - Storonova, Olga
AU - Troskot, Rosana
AU - Trukhmanov, Alexander
AU - Tutuian, Radu
AU - Woodland, Philip
AU - Zerbib, Frank
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Background: Several patients in gastroenterology practice present with esophageal symptoms, and in case of normal endoscopy with biopsies, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is often the next step. Our aim was to develop a European consensus on the clinical application of esophageal HRM, to offer the clinician guidance in selecting patients for HRM and using its results to optimize clinical outcome. Methods: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 38 multidisciplinary experts from 16 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 71 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 statements. Results: The process generated guidance on when to consider esophageal HRM, how to perform it, and how to generate the report. The Delphi process also identified several areas of uncertainty, such as the choice of catheters, the duration of fasting and the position in which HRM is performed, but recommended to perform at least 10 5-ml swallows in supine position for each study. Postprandial combined HRM impedance is considered useful for diagnosing rumination. There is a large lack of consensus on treatment implications of HRM findings, which is probably the single area requiring future targeted research. Conclusions and inferences: A multinational and multidisciplinary group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on technical aspects, indications, performance, analysis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications of esophageal HRM.
AB - Background: Several patients in gastroenterology practice present with esophageal symptoms, and in case of normal endoscopy with biopsies, high-resolution manometry (HRM) is often the next step. Our aim was to develop a European consensus on the clinical application of esophageal HRM, to offer the clinician guidance in selecting patients for HRM and using its results to optimize clinical outcome. Methods: A Delphi consensus was initiated with 38 multidisciplinary experts from 16 European countries who conducted a literature summary and voting process on 71 statements. Quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus (defined as >80% agreement) was reached for 33 statements. Results: The process generated guidance on when to consider esophageal HRM, how to perform it, and how to generate the report. The Delphi process also identified several areas of uncertainty, such as the choice of catheters, the duration of fasting and the position in which HRM is performed, but recommended to perform at least 10 5-ml swallows in supine position for each study. Postprandial combined HRM impedance is considered useful for diagnosing rumination. There is a large lack of consensus on treatment implications of HRM findings, which is probably the single area requiring future targeted research. Conclusions and inferences: A multinational and multidisciplinary group of European experts summarized the current state of consensus on technical aspects, indications, performance, analysis, diagnosis, and therapeutic implications of esophageal HRM.
KW - Chicago classification
KW - achalasia
KW - belching
KW - chest pain
KW - esophageal manometry
KW - impedance manometry
KW - rumination
KW - solid state catheter
KW - spasm
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104321517&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/nmo.14043
DO - 10.1111/nmo.14043
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33274525
AN - SCOPUS:85104321517
SN - 1350-1925
VL - 33
JO - Neurogastroenterology and Motility
JF - Neurogastroenterology and Motility
IS - 5
M1 - e14043
ER -