TY - JOUR
T1 - European risk governance of nanotechnology
T2 - Explaining the emerging regulatory policy
AU - Justo-Hanani, Ronit
AU - Dayan, Tamar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/10/1
Y1 - 2015/10/1
N2 - This paper explores political drivers and policy processes of the emerging EU's regulatory policy for nanotechnology risks. Since 2004 the EU has been developing a regulatory policy to tighten control and to improve regulatory adequacy and knowledge of nanotechnology risks. This regulatory evolution is of theoretical interest as well as of policy relevance, addressing the links between risk governance and technological innovation policy in Europe. Although nanotechnology is among the largest EU-regulated industries and a policy domain in which EU regulatory activities continue to grow, political perspective (actors, institutions and processes) remain underexplored. We explored the emergent policy at the EU-level from three theoretical perspectives and a set of derived testable hypotheses concerning the co-evolution of global economic competition, policymakers' preferences and institutional structure. We thus pave the way for developing grounded analytical accounts of this newly-created governance domain. We argue that all three are key drivers shaping the technology regulation policy and each explains some aspect of the policy process: motivation, agenda-setting and decision-making.
AB - This paper explores political drivers and policy processes of the emerging EU's regulatory policy for nanotechnology risks. Since 2004 the EU has been developing a regulatory policy to tighten control and to improve regulatory adequacy and knowledge of nanotechnology risks. This regulatory evolution is of theoretical interest as well as of policy relevance, addressing the links between risk governance and technological innovation policy in Europe. Although nanotechnology is among the largest EU-regulated industries and a policy domain in which EU regulatory activities continue to grow, political perspective (actors, institutions and processes) remain underexplored. We explored the emergent policy at the EU-level from three theoretical perspectives and a set of derived testable hypotheses concerning the co-evolution of global economic competition, policymakers' preferences and institutional structure. We thus pave the way for developing grounded analytical accounts of this newly-created governance domain. We argue that all three are key drivers shaping the technology regulation policy and each explains some aspect of the policy process: motivation, agenda-setting and decision-making.
KW - European Union governance
KW - Nanotechnology risks
KW - Regulatory policy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937902620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.001
DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.001
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84937902620
SN - 0048-7333
VL - 44
SP - 1527
EP - 1536
JO - Research Policy
JF - Research Policy
IS - 8
ER -