Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals

Lidia V. Gabis*, Shahar Shefer, Annick Raas-Rothschild

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Asymptomatic female carriers of the FMR1 premutation at childbearing age have been mostly identified through prenatal genetic testing, which is routinely proposed in Israel. During the last few years, a premutation phenotype in males and females has been defined—FXAND, including neuropsychiatric disorder, learning difficulties, endocrine dysfunction, and premature ovarian failure. So when a family at risk is identified, should individuals be tested for premutation even if minors? In order to understand what professionals’ views are with regard to testing FMR1 premutation in minors, we performed a questionnaire testing both ethical attitudes and knowledge. Eighty-two percent of professionals would positively consider fragile X testing in minors, and an additional 15.4% would consider it in boys only. The specific phenotype of full mutation is recognized well by health professionals, while the premutation phenotype is not well known. There is a need to expand awareness on the fragile X premutation phenotype through better information. Testing of fragile X premutation status in minors should be considered, when at risk due to family history.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-259
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Molecular Neuroscience
Volume70
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2020

Funding

FundersFunder number
Leora Allen

    Keywords

    • FMR1 premutation
    • Fragile X
    • Prevention
    • Siblings

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethical Dilemmas Linked to Fragile X Testing of Minors—a Preliminary Survey Among Professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this