Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science

  • Yaela N. Golumbic*
  • , Keren Dalyot
  • , Yael Barel-Ben David
  • , Melanie Keller
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • The University of Sydney
  • Technion-Israel Institute of Technology
  • Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scientific concepts and core ideas are fundamental for scientific inquiry and research. However, they are not always understood by non-scientists who encounter science in the media, conversations with friends, and other daily contexts. To assess how non-scientists reason with science in daily life, we extend the work described by Drummond and Fischhoff by developing an everyday scientific reasoning scale and demonstrating its ability to predict the use and application of daily scientific information. This article features three studies describing the development, validation, and use of the everyday scientific reasoning scale. Findings demonstrate an association between respondents’ scores on the everyday science reasoning scale and their level of education and suggest that using daily scenarios for framing science facilitates the process of understanding scientific concepts. These results have important implications for communicating science in society and engaging diverse populations with science.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)40-55
Number of pages16
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
EIT Food
Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel3-13697

    Keywords

    • public understanding of science
    • science in daily life
    • science literacy
    • science reasoning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Establishing an everyday scientific reasoning scale to learn how non-scientists reason with science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this