Erratum to “TICACOS international: A multi-center, randomized, prospective controlled study comparing tight calorie control versus liberal calorie administration study” (Clinical Nutrition (2021) 40(2) (380–387), (S0261561420302594), (10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.024))

P. Singer*, E. De Waele, C. Sanchez, S. Ruiz Santana, J. C. Montejo, P. F. Laterre, A. Soroksky, E. Moscovici, I. Kagan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

In the above article some errata have been occurred which we apologize for. These are the following: In the abstract it should be read: Twenty-eight days mortality (53 in the control group, 45 in the study group) was not significantly different between the groups. In Table 3, ICU mortality should be read 44 in the ITT control group and 40 in the ITT study group. The mortality at 3 (22 more deaths in the study group and 29 in the control group) and 6 months (8 more deaths in the study group and 7 more in the control group) is the added mortality rate in these periods and are not significantly different. In the paragraph 3.1 Outcome, it should be read: Hospital mortality shown on the Kaplan Meyer curve (Figure 4) was decreased in the study group but this trend was not significant. Finally the Figure 4 should be replaced by the following one:[Formula presented] 1. Singer P, De Waele E, Sanchez C, Ruiz Santana S, Montejo JC, Laterre PF, Soroksky A, Moscovici E, Kagan I, TICACOS international: A multi-center, randomized, prospective controlled study comparing tight calorie control versus Liberal calorie administration study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-441
Number of pages2
JournalClinical Nutrition
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to “TICACOS international: A multi-center, randomized, prospective controlled study comparing tight calorie control versus liberal calorie administration study” (Clinical Nutrition (2021) 40(2) (380–387), (S0261561420302594), (10.1016/j.clnu.2020.05.024))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this