Erratum: Reverberation mapping of luminous quasars at High-z (Astrophysical Journal (2018) 865 (56) DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aada45)

Our recent paper Lira et al. (2018) contains errors in the list of rest-frame lags presented in Table 4, which, for all objects after the fourth entry (CT320), were based on incorrect redshift values. However, the correct lag values were used in the determinations of the radius–luminosity relations given in Equations (1)–(4) and the various plots presented in the paper. Additionally, we emphasize that the redshifts in Table 1 are correct. The revised Table 4 is included here. One omission, however, is that the quasar CT406 was included in the determination of the IV radius–luminosity relation, even though it was not listed as such in the original paper (first paragraph of Section 5.1). Finally, there are two issues with the radius–luminosity plots (Figure 7). First, J214355 was omitted from the C IV plot. Second, the UV luminosity error bars appear too large by a factor of 3. These problems only affected the graphical representation of the radius–luminosity relations. The UV luminosity errors were correctly applied when deriving Equations (1)–(4). A new version of Figure 7 is included. (Figure Presented).