Erratum: Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Equal or preferred substitutes for ACE inhibitors? (Archives of Internal Medicine (2000) 160 (1905-1911))

E. Grossman; F. H. Messerli; J. M. Neutel

Erratum: Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Equal or preferred substitutes for ACE inhibitors? (Archives of Internal Medicine (2000) 160 (1905-1911))

E. Grossman, F. H. Messerli, J. M. Neutel

Faculty of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	300
Number of pages	1
Journal	Archives of Internal Medicine
Volume	161
Issue number	2
State	Published - 22 Jan 2001

Cite this

@article{83d37ab4bf514d2890321801ffb228f7,

title = "Erratum: Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Equal or preferred substitutes for ACE inhibitors? (Archives of Internal Medicine (2000) 160 (1905-1911))",

author = "E. Grossman and Messerli, {F. H.} and Neutel, {J. M.}",

year = "2001",

month = jan,

day = "22",

language = "אנגלית",

volume = "161",

pages = "300",

journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",

issn = "2168-6106",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Erratum

T2 - Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Equal or preferred substitutes for ACE inhibitors? (Archives of Internal Medicine (2000) 160 (1905-1911))

AU - Grossman, E.

AU - Messerli, F. H.

AU - Neutel, J. M.

PY - 2001/1/22

Y1 - 2001/1/22

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035931289&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - תגובה / דיון

AN - SCOPUS:0035931289

VL - 161

SP - 300

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 2

ER -

Erratum: Angiotensin II receptor blockers: Equal or preferred substitutes for ACE inhibitors? (Archives of Internal Medicine (2000) 160 (1905-1911))

Other files and links

Cite this