Epistemic Game Theory

Eddie Dekel, Marciano Siniscalchi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

63 Scopus citations

Abstract

Epistemic game theory formalizes assumptions about rationality and mutual beliefs in a formal language, then studies their behavioral implications in games. Specifically, it asks: what do different notions of rationality and different assumptions about what players believe about.. .what others believe about the rationality of players imply regarding play in a game? Being explicit about these assumptions can be important, because solution concepts are often motivated intuitively in terms of players' beliefs and their rationality; however, the epistemic analysis may show limitations in these intuitions, reveal what additional assumptions are hidden in the informal arguments, clarify the concepts or show how the intuitions can be generalized. A further premise of this chapter is that the primitives of the model- namely, the hierarchies of beliefs-should be elicitable, at least in principle. Building upon explicit assumptions about elicitable primitives, we present classical and recent developments in epistemic game theory and provide characterizations of a nonexhaustive, but wide, range of solution concepts.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHandbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Pages619-702
Number of pages84
Edition1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Publication series

NameHandbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications
Number1
Volume4
ISSN (Print)1574-0005

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Science FoundationSES-1227434

    Keywords

    • Backward induction
    • Common-prior assumption
    • Conditional probability systems
    • Epistemic game theory
    • Forward induction
    • Hierarchies of beliefs
    • Interactive epistemology
    • Lexicographic probability systems
    • Rationalizability
    • Solution concepts

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Epistemic Game Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this