Enhanced bactericidal efficacy of NaOCl at pH12 followed by acidi fied NaOCl at pH6.5 on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm

Ronald Wigler*, Shlomo Matalon, Tomer Goldberger, Anat Or Lerner, Anda Kfir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the bactericidal efficacy of sequential use of NaOCl pH 12 followed by acidified NaOCl pH 6.5, and compare it to that of either of these NaOCl solutions alone. E. faecalis biofilm was grown on standardized dentine specimens for four weeks. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups: (A) 4 min exposure to 0.9% saline solution (control); (B) 4 min exposure to 4% NaOCl pH 12; (C) 4 min exposure to 4% NaOCl pH 6.5; and (D) 2 min exposure to 4% NaOCl pH 12 followed by 2 min exposure to 4% NaOCl pH 6.5. The bactericidal activity was evaluated after the 4 min of contact time using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The volume ratio of red fluorescence to green and red fluorescence indicated the proportion of dead cells in the biofilm. The percent of dead cells in the saline solution group was significantly lower than those in the other groups. There was no significant difference between NaOCl pH 12 compared to NaOCl pH 6.5. The sequential use of NaOCl pH 12 followed by pH 6.5 significantly increased the percent of dead cells compared to both the samples exposed to either NaOCl pH 12 or pH 6.5. These results show that sequential irrigation protocol had a stronger bactericidal effect than the commonly used NaOCl pH 12.

Original languageEnglish
Article number6096
JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • Bactericidal efficacy
  • Biofilm
  • Confocal laser scanningmicroscopy
  • Enterococcus faecalis
  • NaOCl
  • pH

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Enhanced bactericidal efficacy of NaOCl at pH12 followed by acidi fied NaOCl at pH6.5 on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this