TY - JOUR
T1 - Endophthalmitis today
T2 - A multispecialty ophthalmology department perspective
AU - Artsi, Elad Ben
AU - Katz, Gabriel
AU - Kinori, Michael
AU - Moisseiev, Joseph
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 The Authors.
PY - 2015/6/19
Y1 - 2015/6/19
N2 - Purpose: To portray the current scene of endophthalmitis in a multispecialty ophthalmology department regarding etiologies and treatment guidelines. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis or suspected endophthalmitis from 2009 to 2012. Results: A total of 24 eyes were diagnosed with endophthalmitis or suspected endophthalmitis during a 4-year period. The etiologies included endogenous endophthalmitis (6), blebitis (3), Ahmed valve implantation (3, 2 of them with late infection), postcataract surgery (3), intravitreal injections (4), penetrating injury (2), and other surgical procedures (3). Of the postcataract surgery cases, 1 was a congenital cataract surgery, and 2 were referrals. There were no endophthalmitis cases in 4603 adults undergoing cataract surgery in our department during this period. There were 14 positive cultures: 1 was candida and the rest bacteria. Ten of the bacteria cases were Gram-positive cocci (predominantly strep species), 3 were Gram-negative, and coagulase negative staphylococci were detected in 2 cases. Conclusions: Our study indicates a significant change in the case mix of endophthalmitis. The past leading cause, cataract surgery, was dramatically reduced, and intravitreal injections became a major cause. The change in etiologies, and possibly in the microbial flora, warrants reconsideration of the rules that guided the management of endophthalmitis since the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.
AB - Purpose: To portray the current scene of endophthalmitis in a multispecialty ophthalmology department regarding etiologies and treatment guidelines. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis or suspected endophthalmitis from 2009 to 2012. Results: A total of 24 eyes were diagnosed with endophthalmitis or suspected endophthalmitis during a 4-year period. The etiologies included endogenous endophthalmitis (6), blebitis (3), Ahmed valve implantation (3, 2 of them with late infection), postcataract surgery (3), intravitreal injections (4), penetrating injury (2), and other surgical procedures (3). Of the postcataract surgery cases, 1 was a congenital cataract surgery, and 2 were referrals. There were no endophthalmitis cases in 4603 adults undergoing cataract surgery in our department during this period. There were 14 positive cultures: 1 was candida and the rest bacteria. Ten of the bacteria cases were Gram-positive cocci (predominantly strep species), 3 were Gram-negative, and coagulase negative staphylococci were detected in 2 cases. Conclusions: Our study indicates a significant change in the case mix of endophthalmitis. The past leading cause, cataract surgery, was dramatically reduced, and intravitreal injections became a major cause. The change in etiologies, and possibly in the microbial flora, warrants reconsideration of the rules that guided the management of endophthalmitis since the Endophthalmitis Vitrectomy Study.
KW - Cataract
KW - Endophthalmitis
KW - Etiology
KW - Injection
KW - Intravitreal
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954053558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5301/ejo.5000642
DO - 10.5301/ejo.5000642
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84954053558
SN - 1120-6721
VL - 26
SP - 71
EP - 77
JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - European Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 1
ER -