TY - CHAP
T1 - Elaborations, Developments, Justifications
AU - Landman, Fred
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Section 11.1 pulls together themes from several earlier chapters. It presents an Iceberg semantic analysis of partitives. It gives a conservative semantics for measure comparison most. The section uses both of these to show that neat mass nouns allow measure comparison readings that are distinct from the measure comparision readings of corresponding partitives. This shows that the measure comparison readings of neat mass nouns cannot be attributed to downshifting, and, with that, the section clinches the argument that neat mass nouns and count nouns differ not just in a grammatical feature, but in their semantics. Section 11.2 redefines the operation of singular shift from Chap. 6 by using a slightly extended notion of i-set. Section 11.3 deals with pragmagic: changing, in context, the ontology as part of a give and take between speech participants. I discuss two techniques for deriving interpretations with a disjoint base: the technique of doppelgänger for local overlap situations, and the global technique of indexing for counting parts and wholes separately. The second technique is incorporated in the neat semantics for distributive adjective big. I discuss the more drastic effects on count noun interpretation. Section 11.4 contains a very preliminary discussion of abstract mass nouns. It is argued that abstract event nouns like crime have both count and neat mass interpretations, and it is argued that abstract degree nouns like love have both mess mass and neat mass interpretations. These observations go against some claims made in the literature. Section 11.5 is my Apologia about the Literature. I have been in this book very selective in what literature to discuss extensively, what to discuss briefly, and what not at all. These choices have been motivated by the story that I decided to tell in this book – from Mountain semantics to Iceberg semantics – and by the form that I chose for telling it. This final section provides some comments on the diachronic setting for this story, as I see it, and in that way gives some of my rationale for making the choices I made. In the course of this, some more important literature is mentioned, and at times even discussed.
AB - Section 11.1 pulls together themes from several earlier chapters. It presents an Iceberg semantic analysis of partitives. It gives a conservative semantics for measure comparison most. The section uses both of these to show that neat mass nouns allow measure comparison readings that are distinct from the measure comparision readings of corresponding partitives. This shows that the measure comparison readings of neat mass nouns cannot be attributed to downshifting, and, with that, the section clinches the argument that neat mass nouns and count nouns differ not just in a grammatical feature, but in their semantics. Section 11.2 redefines the operation of singular shift from Chap. 6 by using a slightly extended notion of i-set. Section 11.3 deals with pragmagic: changing, in context, the ontology as part of a give and take between speech participants. I discuss two techniques for deriving interpretations with a disjoint base: the technique of doppelgänger for local overlap situations, and the global technique of indexing for counting parts and wholes separately. The second technique is incorporated in the neat semantics for distributive adjective big. I discuss the more drastic effects on count noun interpretation. Section 11.4 contains a very preliminary discussion of abstract mass nouns. It is argued that abstract event nouns like crime have both count and neat mass interpretations, and it is argued that abstract degree nouns like love have both mess mass and neat mass interpretations. These observations go against some claims made in the literature. Section 11.5 is my Apologia about the Literature. I have been in this book very selective in what literature to discuss extensively, what to discuss briefly, and what not at all. These choices have been motivated by the story that I decided to tell in this book – from Mountain semantics to Iceberg semantics – and by the form that I chose for telling it. This final section provides some comments on the diachronic setting for this story, as I see it, and in that way gives some of my rationale for making the choices I made. In the course of this, some more important literature is mentioned, and at times even discussed.
KW - Abstract mass noun
KW - Measure comparison
KW - Partitive
KW - Pragmagic
KW - Singular shift
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101993878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-42711-5_11
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-42711-5_11
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontobookanthology.chapter???
AN - SCOPUS:85101993878
T3 - Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy
SP - 339
EP - 377
BT - Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy
PB - Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
ER -