TY - JOUR
T1 - Eine empfehlung zur durchführungspraxis von fixierungen im rahmen der stationären psychiatrischen akutbehandlung
T2 - Ein beitrag zur harmonisierung bester klinischer praxis in Europa
AU - Kallert, Thomas W.
AU - Jurjanz, Luisa
AU - Schnall, Katja
AU - Glöckner, Matthias
AU - Gerdjikov, Ivan
AU - Raboch, Jiri
AU - Georgiadou, Elena
AU - Solomon, Zahava
AU - De Rosa, Corrado
AU - Dembinskas, Algirdas
AU - Adamowski, Tomasz
AU - Nawka, Petr
AU - Hernandez, Claudio
AU - Björkdahl, Anna
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - Objective: One aim of the multi-site EUNOMIA-project was to establish a European recommendation for the best clinical practice of administering coercive measures. This article reports the results on mechanical restraint. Methods: Local expert groups in 11 countries worked out their recommendations mostly in semi-structured group discussions. By use of a system of categories developed with a content-analytical method, these national documents were comparatively assessed, and integrated into a common clinical recommendation. Results: Legal and clinical pre-conditions for the use of mechanical restraint, specific instructions for the clinical behaviour of different professional groups, ethical issues, and procedural aspects of quality assurance are reported in detail. Conclusions: Compared with established clinical guidelines, similarities concerning basic principles of clinical use appear to be higher than similarities concerning practical details. Future development of guidelines for the best practice of coercive measures urgently needs the use of advanced methodology.
AB - Objective: One aim of the multi-site EUNOMIA-project was to establish a European recommendation for the best clinical practice of administering coercive measures. This article reports the results on mechanical restraint. Methods: Local expert groups in 11 countries worked out their recommendations mostly in semi-structured group discussions. By use of a system of categories developed with a content-analytical method, these national documents were comparatively assessed, and integrated into a common clinical recommendation. Results: Legal and clinical pre-conditions for the use of mechanical restraint, specific instructions for the clinical behaviour of different professional groups, ethical issues, and procedural aspects of quality assurance are reported in detail. Conclusions: Compared with established clinical guidelines, similarities concerning basic principles of clinical use appear to be higher than similarities concerning practical details. Future development of guidelines for the best practice of coercive measures urgently needs the use of advanced methodology.
KW - Best clinical practice
KW - Guidelines
KW - Mechanical restraint
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Transnational harmonization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249774918&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1055/s-2006-952007
DO - 10.1055/s-2006-952007
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:34249774918
SN - 1611-8332
VL - 34
SP - S233-S240
JO - Psychiatrische Praxis, Supplement
JF - Psychiatrische Praxis, Supplement
IS - 2
ER -