Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis

Alon Kalron*, Michal Greenberg-Abrahami, Simona Gelav, Anat Achiron

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the effects of a new home-based sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with MS experiencing upper limb sensory deficits. METHODS: Twenty-five people with relapsing-remitting MS (18 women), mean age 50.6 years (SD = 11.4), volunteered to participate. Participants were initially assigned to a 7-week control phase followed by a 3-week home-based sensory re-education phase. Measurements used were the nine-hole peg test, the two point discrimination test, the monofilaments test and the functional dexterity test. Measurements were collected at baseline, following the control phase and at the end of the trial. RESULTS: Participants demonstrated an improvement in the nine-hole peg (26.8 (SD = 3.5) vs. 22.6 (SD = 3.2); mean difference (95% CI) 4.9 (0.9, 7.1), P = 0.03) and functional dexterity tests (38.6 (SD = 4.4) vs. 33.8 (SD = 4.9); mean difference (95% CI) 4.8 (1.8, 7.0); P = 0.02) at the end of the sensory re-education phase compared to the end of the control phase. No differences were observed as to the monofilaments and two-point discrimination tests. CONCLUSIONS: Sensory re-education training does not affect the level of sensory impairment in the hand but may lead to improvement in select measures of manual dexterity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)943-948
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Keywords

  • Multiple sclerosis
  • manual dexterity
  • sensory deficits
  • sensory retraining

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of a new sensory re-education training tool on hand sensibility and manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this