TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of taper of glide path preparation on debris extrusion during root canal instrumentation of mesial canals in mandibular molars
AU - Pawar, Ajinkya M
AU - Pawar, Suraj
AU - Thakur, Bhagyashree
AU - Dedhia, Jaanavi
AU - Kfir, Anda
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objective: To compare the effect of glide path established by size 20/0.02 taper hand K-file and size 20/0.04 taper rotary file, on the amount of debris extruded apically during root canal instrumentation by rotary ProTaper Universal (S1-F2) and reciprocating WaveOne (Primary) file systems.
Materials and methods: Eighty mandibular molars with curved mesial roots and two separate canals were selected and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40) for glide path preparation using either size 20/0.02 taper hand K-files and size 20/0.04 taper rotary files. These groups were further divided into two (n = 20) for root canal instrumentation by ProTaper Universal and WaveOne files; Group 1: 20/0.02 + ProTaper, Group 2: 20/0.02 + WaveOne, Group 3: 20/0.04 + ProTaper, and Group 4: 20/0.04 + WaveOne. The debris extruded during instrumentation was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. Tubes containing the dry, extruded debris were then weighed. One-way analysis of variance was applied to the weights obtained followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparison.
Results: All the groups resulted in debris extrusion. Establishing a glide path with size 20/0.04 taper rotary files, resulted in less debris extrusion, compared to a glide path prepared by size 20/0.02 taper hand K-files (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Creating a glide path with size 20/0.04 rotary file, reduced the debris extrusion in curved root canals during instrumentation by ProTaper Universal and WaveOne.
AB - Objective: To compare the effect of glide path established by size 20/0.02 taper hand K-file and size 20/0.04 taper rotary file, on the amount of debris extruded apically during root canal instrumentation by rotary ProTaper Universal (S1-F2) and reciprocating WaveOne (Primary) file systems.
Materials and methods: Eighty mandibular molars with curved mesial roots and two separate canals were selected and randomly divided into two groups (n = 40) for glide path preparation using either size 20/0.02 taper hand K-files and size 20/0.04 taper rotary files. These groups were further divided into two (n = 20) for root canal instrumentation by ProTaper Universal and WaveOne files; Group 1: 20/0.02 + ProTaper, Group 2: 20/0.02 + WaveOne, Group 3: 20/0.04 + ProTaper, and Group 4: 20/0.04 + WaveOne. The debris extruded during instrumentation was collected in pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes and stored in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. Tubes containing the dry, extruded debris were then weighed. One-way analysis of variance was applied to the weights obtained followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for multiple comparison.
Results: All the groups resulted in debris extrusion. Establishing a glide path with size 20/0.04 taper rotary files, resulted in less debris extrusion, compared to a glide path prepared by size 20/0.02 taper hand K-files (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Creating a glide path with size 20/0.04 rotary file, reduced the debris extrusion in curved root canals during instrumentation by ProTaper Universal and WaveOne.
UR - http://www.quintpub.com/journals/endo/abstract.php?article_id=18049#.YNhpsOj7Q2w
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
SN - 1753-2817
VL - 11
SP - 251
EP - 256
JO - ENDO - Endodontic Practice Today
JF - ENDO - Endodontic Practice Today
IS - 4
ER -