TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of repeated applanation tonometry on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurements
AU - Gaton, Dan D.
AU - Ehrenberg, Miriam
AU - Lusky, Moshe
AU - Wussuki-Lior, Orly
AU - Dotan, Gad
AU - Weinberger, Dov
AU - Snir, Moshe
PY - 2010/6
Y1 - 2010/6
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the stability of successive applanation tonometry measurements in glaucomatous eyes. Methods: A prospective, comparative, randomized, and evaluator-masked study was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Sixty-seven patients with glaucoma attending our glaucoma clinic underwent four successive intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with Goldmann-type applanation tonometry. Findings were compared with 70 patients scheduled for cataract surgery, similar in age and sex. The results were statistically analyzed with repeated measures analysis. Results: In the glaucoma group, the difference between the first and second IOP measurements was statistically significant (15.94 mmHg vs 14.9 mmHg, p<0.0001), as was the decrease in IOP from the first measurement to each of the other successive measurements. No significant change in IOP was noted in the control group (mean, 13.7 mmHg). Conclusions: Patients with glaucoma show a decrease in IOP on repeated applanation tonometry measurements. By contrast, in individuals without glaucoma, no significant decrease in IOP on repeated applanation tonometry measurements was found.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the stability of successive applanation tonometry measurements in glaucomatous eyes. Methods: A prospective, comparative, randomized, and evaluator-masked study was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Sixty-seven patients with glaucoma attending our glaucoma clinic underwent four successive intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements with Goldmann-type applanation tonometry. Findings were compared with 70 patients scheduled for cataract surgery, similar in age and sex. The results were statistically analyzed with repeated measures analysis. Results: In the glaucoma group, the difference between the first and second IOP measurements was statistically significant (15.94 mmHg vs 14.9 mmHg, p<0.0001), as was the decrease in IOP from the first measurement to each of the other successive measurements. No significant change in IOP was noted in the control group (mean, 13.7 mmHg). Conclusions: Patients with glaucoma show a decrease in IOP on repeated applanation tonometry measurements. By contrast, in individuals without glaucoma, no significant decrease in IOP on repeated applanation tonometry measurements was found.
KW - Glaucoma
KW - Intraocular pressure
KW - Recurrent applanation tonometry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952520990&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/02713681003678824
DO - 10.3109/02713681003678824
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:77952520990
SN - 0271-3683
VL - 35
SP - 475
EP - 479
JO - Current Eye Research
JF - Current Eye Research
IS - 6
ER -