Effect of glycaemic control on cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes with pre-existing cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yael Barer*, Ohad Cohen, Tali Cukierman-Yaffe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The role of intensive glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) is controversial. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine in a subset of people with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, the CV effect of intensive glucose control versus standard of care. We searched Medline, the Cochrane library, EMBASE and the National Institutes of Health Trial registration database for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effect of intensive glucose control versus standard glucose control in people with type 2 diabetes on incident CVD. Data were extracted using a structured form. When data were not available in the publications, authors were contacted. Eight trials involving 8339 participants were included. Among adults with type 2 diabetes and pre-existing CVD, there was no difference in the risk of CV events in those allocated to intensive glucose control compared with those in the standard care arm (relative risk 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.09). In conclusion, in people with diabetes and pre-existing CVD, intensive glucose control versus standard care had a neutral effect on incident CV events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)732-735
Number of pages4
JournalDiabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

Keywords

  • cardiovascular disease
  • glucose control
  • intensive
  • meta-analysis
  • systematic review
  • type 2 diabetes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of glycaemic control on cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes with pre-existing cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this