Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates

Eran Ashwal, Eran Hadar, Rony Chen, Amir Aviram, Liran Hiersch, Rinat Gabbay-Benziv*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate gender effect on induction of labor (IoL) failure rates stratified by indication to delivery. Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of singleton pregnancies 34–42 weeks undergoing cervical ripening using controlled-release PGE2 vaginal insert. IoL Indications were divided into: (1) maternal; (2) hypertensive disorders; (3) premature rupture of membrane or (4) fetal (growth abnormalities, oligohydramnios, postdate, etc,). IoL failure was defined as: (1) Bishop-score ≤7 after 24 hours of PGE2; (2) cesarean delivery due to failed induction; (3) fetal distress followed by PGE2 removal and emergent cesarean. IoL failure rates were stratified by neonatal gender and indication to induction. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to control outcomes to potential confounders. Results: Overall, 1062 pregnancies were included–521 (49%) had male fetuses. IoL indications did not differ by gender. IoL failure rate was 20.1% (213/1062)–76% for unfavorable Bishop-score after PGE2 removal; 5.2% for failed induction and 18.8% for fetal-distress while on PGE2. Overall, 14.3% delivered by cesarean section. There were no differences in IoL failure as a group or by indications to induction stratified by fetal gender (21.7% vs. 18.5%, male vs. females, p < 0.05). Conclusions: IoL failure rate is not affected by fetal gender regardless of indication to induction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3009-3013
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume30
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Failed induction
  • cesarean section
  • fetal gender
  • induction of labor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this