TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of Continuous Nutritionist-led Guidance on Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment with Endorectal Spacing
T2 - A Prospective Pilot Trial
AU - Carmeli, Yonatan
AU - Shpatz, Yael
AU - Oren-Ivry, Iris
AU - Mansano, Anat
AU - Lewin, Ron
AU - Barorian, Idan
AU - Mattout, Jacob
AU - Weiss, Ilana
AU - Haisraely, Ory
AU - Lawrence, Yaacov Richard
AU - Symon, Zvi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025/6/1
Y1 - 2025/6/1
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the effect of a daily nutritionist consultation on rectal volume, gas, and prostate displacement during Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment (SBRT) with an endorectal spacer. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients receiving 5 fraction SBRT with endorectal spacing were prospectively enrolled for an intensive daily nutritionist intervention utilizing biofeedback based on image guidance from each fraction. A retrospective control cohort receiving a standard bowel preparation was compared. Rectal volume, rectal gas, and prostate displacement were assessed by analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Data was analyzed using the SPSS statistics software. Results: Intense dietary intervention with biofeedback led to a consistently lower rectal gas score over 5 fractions (P<0.001) and less variability in rectal volume during prostate SBRT indicating a nonsignificant trend for superior preparation in the intervention group compared with controls, particularly for the first 2 fractions. However, there was no significant impact on prostate displacement as measured by couch correction. Conclusions: Intense dietary consultations effectively reduce rectal gas and variation of rectal volume during prostate SBRT with endorectal spacing. However, there was no advantage in reducing prostate displacement. Thus, labor-intensive daily nutritionist intervention with biofeedback is not cost-effective in reducing organ motion in patients with endorectal spacers compared with standard pretreatment dietary advice and is not recommended.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the effect of a daily nutritionist consultation on rectal volume, gas, and prostate displacement during Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment (SBRT) with an endorectal spacer. Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients receiving 5 fraction SBRT with endorectal spacing were prospectively enrolled for an intensive daily nutritionist intervention utilizing biofeedback based on image guidance from each fraction. A retrospective control cohort receiving a standard bowel preparation was compared. Rectal volume, rectal gas, and prostate displacement were assessed by analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Data was analyzed using the SPSS statistics software. Results: Intense dietary intervention with biofeedback led to a consistently lower rectal gas score over 5 fractions (P<0.001) and less variability in rectal volume during prostate SBRT indicating a nonsignificant trend for superior preparation in the intervention group compared with controls, particularly for the first 2 fractions. However, there was no significant impact on prostate displacement as measured by couch correction. Conclusions: Intense dietary consultations effectively reduce rectal gas and variation of rectal volume during prostate SBRT with endorectal spacing. However, there was no advantage in reducing prostate displacement. Thus, labor-intensive daily nutritionist intervention with biofeedback is not cost-effective in reducing organ motion in patients with endorectal spacers compared with standard pretreatment dietary advice and is not recommended.
KW - dietary intervention
KW - endorectal spacer
KW - prostate SBRT
KW - rectal gas
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000996175
U2 - 10.1097/COC.0000000000001178
DO - 10.1097/COC.0000000000001178
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 39964031
AN - SCOPUS:105000996175
SN - 0277-3732
VL - 48
SP - 314
EP - 318
JO - American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
JF - American Journal of Clinical Oncology: Cancer Clinical Trials
IS - 6
ER -