Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: The comfortable AMI randomized trial

  • Lorenz Räber
  • , Henning Kelbæk
  • , Miodrag Ostoijc
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Dik Heg
  • , David Tüller
  • , Clemens Von Birgelen
  • , Marco Roffi
  • , Aris Moschovitis
  • , Ahmed A. Khattab
  • , Peter Wenaweser
  • , Robert Bonvini
  • , Giovanni Pedrazzini
  • , Ran Kornowski
  • , Klaus Weber
  • , Sven Trelle
  • , Thomas F. Lüscher
  • , Masanori Taniwaki
  • , Christian M. Matter
  • , Bernhard Meier
  • Peter Jüni, Stephan Windecker*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Bern
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Clinical Center of Serbia
  • University of Bristol
  • Triemlispital
  • University of Twente
  • University of Geneva
  • Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Herzzentrum Bodensee
  • University of Zurich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

269 Scopus citations

Abstract

Context: The efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents remains controversial in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objective: To compare stents eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer with bare-metal stents in primary PCI. Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial of 1161 patients presenting with STEMI at 11 sites in Europe and Israel between September 19, 2009, and January 25, 2011. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 and 12 months. Intervention: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive the biolimus-eluting stent (n=575) or the bare-metal stent (n=582). Main Outcome Measures: Primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related reinfarction, and ischemiadriven target-lesion revascularization at 1 year. Results: Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year occurred in 24 patients (4.3%) receiving biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer and 49 patients (8.7%) receiving bare-metal stents (hazard ratio [HR], 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.80; P=.004). The difference was driven by a lower risk of target vessel-related reinfarction (3 [0.5%] vs 15 [2.7%]; HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.69; P=.01) and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (9 [1.6%] vs 32 [5.7%]; HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.59; P<.001) in patients receiving biolimus-eluting stents compared with those receiving bare-metal stents. Rates of cardiac death were not significantly different (16 [2.9%] vs 20 [3.5%], P=.53). Definite stent thrombosis occurred in 5 patients (0.9%) treated with biolimus-eluting stents and 12 patients (2.1%; HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.15-1.19; P=.10) treated with bare-metal stents. Conclusion: Compared with a bare-metal stent, the use of biolimus-eluting stents with a biodegradable polymer resulted in a lower rate of the composite of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00962416.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)777-787
Number of pages11
JournalJAMA
Volume308
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Aug 2012

Funding

FundersFunder number
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F&#x00F6;rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung130626

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of biolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer vs bare-metal stents on cardiovascular events among patients with acute myocardial infarction: The comfortable AMI randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this