Does the time interval from the end of sperm processing to intrauterine insemination (lab-to-uterus time) affect treatment outcome?

Anat Stein, Eran Altman, Mali Rotlevi, Avigail Deutsch, Avi Ben-Haroush, Avital Wertheimer, Yael Eizenhamer, Tzippy Schohat, Yoel Shufaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Intra-uterine insemination is an essential component in the treatment of infertility. Success rates are dependent on clinical factors of the female partner, sperm quality, and preparation technique. The effect of the time interval between the end of sperm preparation in the lab, and its injection into the uterine cavity (lab-to-uterus time) is yet to be determined. Aim: To investigate the association between the lab-to-uterus time and the pregnancy rate. Materials and methods: Partner and donor spermatozoa intra-uterine insemination cycles were included. Preparation for intra-uterine insemination of partners’ fresh ejaculate or donor thawed spermatozoa was identical. The time interval from the completion of this stage to the actual intra-uterine injection was recorded. The lab-to-uterus intervals were divided into groups A (0–29 min), B (30–59 min), C (60–89 min), and D (90–180 min). Pregnancy was defined as two adequate consecutive doubling levels of hCG and the pregnancy rates were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 267 female patients (138 partner spermatozoa, 129 donors) who had 470 intra-uterine insemination cycles (218 partner spermatozoa, 252 donors) were included. No significant differences in pregnancy rates per treatment cycle were found between the four lab-to-uterus interval groups: A (n = 96 cycles; 16.7%), B (n = 217; 19.4%), C (n = 121; 16.5%), and D (n = 36; 36.1%). No difference was found in the pregnancy rates between partner and donor spermatozoa. In the case of fresh partner spermatozoa, the pregnancy rates for groups were as follows: A (n = 40 cycles, 20%); B (n = 94; 14.9%), C (n = 70; 17.1%), and D (n = 14; 35.7%) (NS). In the case of thawed donor spermatozoa, the pregnancy rates (per cycle) for groups were as follows: A (n = 56; 14.3%), B (n = 123; 22.8%), C (n = 51; 15.7%), and D (n = 22; 36.4)% (NS). Conclusions: The intra-uterine insemination outcome was not affected by the lab-to-uterus time interval. Extended waiting up to 3 h for insemination did not have any detrimental effect on pregnancy rates, regardless if partner or donor spermatozoa was used.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1859-1863
Number of pages5
JournalAndrology
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2021

Keywords

  • intra-uterine insemination
  • time interval

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the time interval from the end of sperm processing to intrauterine insemination (lab-to-uterus time) affect treatment outcome?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this