Does the combination of four OGTT values enhance the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes? Insights from a retrospective cohort study

Liat Mor*, Ella Toledano, Noa Ben-Shoshan, Eran Weiner, Yael Ganor Paz, Giulia Barda, Michal Levy

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To explore the correlation between a singular value of additive OGTT scores and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. We postulated that a higher additive OGTT score would predict poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from all women with a documented complete OGTT result and subsequent diagnosis of GDM. The additive OGTT score was calculated by adding each individual hourly glucose measurement. Maternal demographics, pregnancy and labor characteristics, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the lower-sum and higher-sum OGTT groups. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify confounders associated with adverse outcomes. Results: In this study, a total of 1497 patients were assessed. The group with higher-sum OGTT scores was characterized by increased rates of GDMA2 (p = 0.008), higher insulin doses (p = 0.009), and higher rates of composite maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes (p = 0.021 and p = 0.030, respectively) compared to the lower-sum OGTT group. Conclusion: The additive OGTT score may aid in predicting the need for insulin treatment, labor course, and neonatal outcomes in GDM patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1475-1481
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume310
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
  • Glycemic control
  • Maternal outcomes
  • Neonatal outcomes
  • Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the combination of four OGTT values enhance the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes? Insights from a retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this