TY - JOUR
T1 - Does body mass index impact assisted reproductive technology treatment outcomes in gestational carriers
AU - Fuchs Weizman, Noga
AU - Defer, Miranda K.
AU - Montbriand, Janice
AU - Pasquale, Julia M.
AU - Silver, Adina
AU - Librach, Clifford L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s).
PY - 2020/5/2
Y1 - 2020/5/2
N2 - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased body mass index (BMI) negatively affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among gestational carriers. Methods: A retrospective matched case-control cohort, including all gestational carrier (GC) cycles performed at CReATe Fertility Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2003 and 2016. Setting: A Canadian fertility clinic, with a large surrogacy program. Patients: All gestational carriers that had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer at our clinic, and had BMI and outcome data available, were matched by BMI to infertile patients treated at our clinic during the same years provided they had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer, and had outcomes data available. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: Clinical pregnancies rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates. Results: BMI was not a reliable prediction factor of any of the measured outcomes. Importantly, the gestational carrier population had better outcomes and a significantly lower overall incidence of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications when compared with infertile patients, treated at our clinic during the same years. Conclusion: BMI is not a reliable predictor of outcomes among gestational carriers.
AB - Background: The purpose of this study was to assess whether increased body mass index (BMI) negatively affects assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes among gestational carriers. Methods: A retrospective matched case-control cohort, including all gestational carrier (GC) cycles performed at CReATe Fertility Centre (Toronto, ON, Canada) between 2003 and 2016. Setting: A Canadian fertility clinic, with a large surrogacy program. Patients: All gestational carriers that had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer at our clinic, and had BMI and outcome data available, were matched by BMI to infertile patients treated at our clinic during the same years provided they had undergone a cycle completed to a transfer, and had outcomes data available. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: Clinical pregnancies rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates. Results: BMI was not a reliable prediction factor of any of the measured outcomes. Importantly, the gestational carrier population had better outcomes and a significantly lower overall incidence of maternal, fetal and neonatal complications when compared with infertile patients, treated at our clinic during the same years. Conclusion: BMI is not a reliable predictor of outcomes among gestational carriers.
KW - ART outcomes
KW - BMI
KW - Clinical pregnancy rate
KW - Gestational carriers
KW - Infertility treatment outcomes
KW - Live birth rate
KW - Miscarriage rate
KW - Obesity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85085151359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12958-020-00602-2
DO - 10.1186/s12958-020-00602-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 32359356
AN - SCOPUS:85085151359
SN - 1477-7827
VL - 18
JO - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
JF - Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
IS - 1
M1 - 35
ER -