Do reported micturition symptoms on the American Urological Association questionnaire correlate with 24-hour home uroflowmetry recordings?

Haim Matzkin*, Alexander Greenstein, Tal Prager-Geller, Mario Sofer, Zvi Braf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Patient subjective descriptions of micturition habits using the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index were compared with uroflowmetry recordings obtained during a 24-hour period. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, the AUA questionnaire was given twice to 42 men. All micturitions during a typical 24-hour period were continuously recorded by a home uroflowmetry system. Daytime frequency, strength and intermittency of the stream, and nocturia were calculated from the recorded data, which were correlated with the matching questionnaire answers. Results: Except for nocturia, there was no correlation between the answers and recorded findings. Conclusions: Men are unable to quantify correctly their own clinical status. The study results cast doubt on the validity of the self-administered AUA survey to reflect clinical micturition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-199
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume155
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1996

Keywords

  • Prostatic hypertrophy
  • Questionnaires
  • Urination
  • Urodynamics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do reported micturition symptoms on the American Urological Association questionnaire correlate with 24-hour home uroflowmetry recordings?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this