Abstract
Purpose: Patient subjective descriptions of micturition habits using the American Urological Association (AUA) symptom index were compared with uroflowmetry recordings obtained during a 24-hour period. Materials and Methods: In a prospective study, the AUA questionnaire was given twice to 42 men. All micturitions during a typical 24-hour period were continuously recorded by a home uroflowmetry system. Daytime frequency, strength and intermittency of the stream, and nocturia were calculated from the recorded data, which were correlated with the matching questionnaire answers. Results: Except for nocturia, there was no correlation between the answers and recorded findings. Conclusions: Men are unable to quantify correctly their own clinical status. The study results cast doubt on the validity of the self-administered AUA survey to reflect clinical micturition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 197-199 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Journal of Urology |
Volume | 155 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1996 |
Keywords
- Prostatic hypertrophy
- Questionnaires
- Urination
- Urodynamics