TY - JOUR
T1 - DNAase I hypersensitive sites may be correlated with genomic regions of large structural variation
AU - Nussinov, Ruth
AU - Shapiro, Bruce
AU - Lipkin, Lewis E.
AU - Maizel, Jacob V.
PY - 1984/8/25
Y1 - 1984/8/25
N2 - Helical-twist, roll and torsion-angle variations calculated by the Calladine (1982)-Dickerson (1983) rules were scanned along several nucleotide sequences for which DNAase I cleavage data are available. It has been shown that for short synthetic oligomers DNAase I cuts preferentially at positions of high helical twist (Dickerson & Drew, 1981; Lomonossoff et al., 1981). Our calculations indicate that DNAase I sensitive and hypersensitive sites in chromatin are correlated with regions of successive, large, helical-twist angle variations from regular B-DNA. In many cases these regions exhibit large variations in base-pair roll and backbone torsion angles as well. It has been suggested that DNAase I cuts in the vicinity of cruciforms. However, it was recently demonstrated by Courey & Wang (1983) and Gellert et al. (1983) that such cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA is kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. We thus propose that clustering of large twist-angle (and/or roll and backbone torsion angle) variations may be among the conformational features recognized by the enzyme. Specific cuts can then preferentially occur at base-pair steps with high helical twists.
AB - Helical-twist, roll and torsion-angle variations calculated by the Calladine (1982)-Dickerson (1983) rules were scanned along several nucleotide sequences for which DNAase I cleavage data are available. It has been shown that for short synthetic oligomers DNAase I cuts preferentially at positions of high helical twist (Dickerson & Drew, 1981; Lomonossoff et al., 1981). Our calculations indicate that DNAase I sensitive and hypersensitive sites in chromatin are correlated with regions of successive, large, helical-twist angle variations from regular B-DNA. In many cases these regions exhibit large variations in base-pair roll and backbone torsion angles as well. It has been suggested that DNAase I cuts in the vicinity of cruciforms. However, it was recently demonstrated by Courey & Wang (1983) and Gellert et al. (1983) that such cruciform formation in a negatively supercoiled DNA is kinetically forbidden under physiological conditions. We thus propose that clustering of large twist-angle (and/or roll and backbone torsion angle) variations may be among the conformational features recognized by the enzyme. Specific cuts can then preferentially occur at base-pair steps with high helical twists.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021691969&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90039-1
DO - 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90039-1
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:0021691969
SN - 0022-2836
VL - 177
SP - 591
EP - 607
JO - Journal of Molecular Biology
JF - Journal of Molecular Biology
IS - 4
ER -