TY - JOUR
T1 - Disparate effects of socioeconomic status on physical function and emotional well-being in older adults
AU - Rios, D. A.
AU - Abdulah, D. R.
AU - Wei, J. Y.
AU - Hausdorff, J. M.
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - We tested the hypothesis that among community living older adults with relatively low and high socioeconomic status (SES), low SES is associated with both poorer emotional well-being and physical function. Ambulatory, community living older men and women (70-89 years of age) were recruited from outpatient geriatric assessment clinics in relatively high socioeconomic areas of greater Boston (High SES, N=47), and from an urban senior center in the inner city (Low SES, N=66). We assessed health status, mental health, upper and lower extremity strength and physical function. We found that health status was not significantly different in the two groups. Quadriceps strength (Low SES: 199±57 N; High SES: 190±56 N; p=0.531) and Up and Go times (Low SES: 14.3±3.1 sec; High SES: 16.7±9.5 sec; p=0.068) were not significantly different in the two groups, while grip strength was slightly higher in the Low SES group (Low SES: 22.8±6.45 kg; High SES: 20.07±7.55 kg; p=0.049). In contrast, subjects with Low SES tended to have an increased tendency towards depression. Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale were 3.8±3.0 in Low SES, and 1.8±2.8 in High SES (p<0.001). We conclude that while health status and physical function were not worse in subjects with low SES, emotional well-being was markedly less compared to seniors with high SES. SES may have disparate effects on physical function and mental health, perhaps due to different compensatory mechanisms.
AB - We tested the hypothesis that among community living older adults with relatively low and high socioeconomic status (SES), low SES is associated with both poorer emotional well-being and physical function. Ambulatory, community living older men and women (70-89 years of age) were recruited from outpatient geriatric assessment clinics in relatively high socioeconomic areas of greater Boston (High SES, N=47), and from an urban senior center in the inner city (Low SES, N=66). We assessed health status, mental health, upper and lower extremity strength and physical function. We found that health status was not significantly different in the two groups. Quadriceps strength (Low SES: 199±57 N; High SES: 190±56 N; p=0.531) and Up and Go times (Low SES: 14.3±3.1 sec; High SES: 16.7±9.5 sec; p=0.068) were not significantly different in the two groups, while grip strength was slightly higher in the Low SES group (Low SES: 22.8±6.45 kg; High SES: 20.07±7.55 kg; p=0.049). In contrast, subjects with Low SES tended to have an increased tendency towards depression. Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale were 3.8±3.0 in Low SES, and 1.8±2.8 in High SES (p<0.001). We conclude that while health status and physical function were not worse in subjects with low SES, emotional well-being was markedly less compared to seniors with high SES. SES may have disparate effects on physical function and mental health, perhaps due to different compensatory mechanisms.
KW - Aging
KW - Emotional well-being
KW - Physical function
KW - Socioeconomic status
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035081398&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/bf03351491
DO - 10.1007/bf03351491
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 11292150
AN - SCOPUS:0035081398
SN - 0394-9532
VL - 13
SP - 30
EP - 37
JO - Aging clinical and experimental research
JF - Aging clinical and experimental research
IS - 1
ER -