Disability assessment by a single rater or a team: A comparatives study with the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure

Amiram Catz*, Malka Itzkovich, Flavia Steinberg, Ora Philo, Haim Ring, Jacob Ronen, Raluca Spasser, Reuven Gepstein, Ada Tamir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure was found to be reliable and more sensitive than the FIM to functional changes, when used by a multidisciplinary team. This study was performed to find out whether assessment may be similar when done by a single rater. Twenty-eight patients with spinal cord lesions participated in the study, in which examinations performed within a week by a single nurse or a team were compared for correlation, differences and agreement. The team members scored their relevant fields. A significant correlation was found between the nurse's scoring and that of physiotherapists and occupational therapists (r = 0.82-0.94; p < 0.0001), and the differences between the mean scores were small. The agreement between raters was modest, however (total agreement 38-90%, Kappa 0.17-0.73). It was concluded that although disability assessment performed by a single nurse may not be as accurate as by a multidisciplinary team, it could be reliable and valid.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-230
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Volume34
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2002
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Catz-Itzkovich SCIM
  • Functional assessment
  • Multidisciplinary team
  • Spinal cord

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disability assessment by a single rater or a team: A comparatives study with the Catz-Itzkovich Spinal Cord Independence Measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this