TY - JOUR
T1 - Digital remains
T2 - property or privacy?
AU - Birnhack, Michael
AU - Morse, Tal
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s) (2022). Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - How should the law treat digital remains, namely, digital personal information of deceased people? Two rival conceptions compete over the best framing: property and privacy. Under property framing, digital remains are just another form of assets, subject to succession law; under privacy framing, digital remains are personal data, and upon death, are not part of the estate. However, whether privacy rights survive death is contested. This article distinguishes between four legal categories of digital remains (intangible items, information about property, intellectual property and personal data), unpacks the two rival framings, and argues that the property framework captures the first three categories of digital remains, but not the last. The article examines the argument for posthumous privacy and concludes that at most, the law should protect reasonable expectations of the living regarding their post-mortem condition, subject to balancing them with competing interests and rights of the living.
AB - How should the law treat digital remains, namely, digital personal information of deceased people? Two rival conceptions compete over the best framing: property and privacy. Under property framing, digital remains are just another form of assets, subject to succession law; under privacy framing, digital remains are personal data, and upon death, are not part of the estate. However, whether privacy rights survive death is contested. This article distinguishes between four legal categories of digital remains (intangible items, information about property, intellectual property and personal data), unpacks the two rival framings, and argues that the property framework captures the first three categories of digital remains, but not the last. The article examines the argument for posthumous privacy and concludes that at most, the law should protect reasonable expectations of the living regarding their post-mortem condition, subject to balancing them with competing interests and rights of the living.
KW - copyright
KW - data protection
KW - digital remains
KW - platforms
KW - posthumous privacy
KW - property
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152572618&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ijlit/eaac019
DO - 10.1093/ijlit/eaac019
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:85152572618
SN - 0967-0769
VL - 30
SP - 280
EP - 301
JO - International Journal of Law and Information Technology
JF - International Journal of Law and Information Technology
IS - 3
ER -