Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance - The prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound

A. Aviram, Y. Yogev, E. Ashwal, L. Hiersch, D. Danon, E. Hadar, R. Gabbay-Benziv

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objective:The sonographic prediction of fetal macrosomia affects obstetrical decision regarding the timing and mode of delivery. We aimed to compare the accuracy of various formulas for prediction of macrosomia at different thresholds.Study Design:This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton gestations at term, with fetal biometrical measurements taken up to 7 days prior to delivery (2007 to 2014). Sonographic estimated fetal weight was calculated using 20 previously published formulas. Macrosomia prediction was evaluated for every formula utilizing: (1) measures of accuracy (sensitivity, specificity and so on); (2) comparison of the systematic and random errors (SE and RE), and the proportion of estimates within 10% of actual birth weight for macrosomic and non-macrosomic neonates. Performance measurements were evaluated for different macrosomia thresholds: 4000, 4250 and 4500 g. Best performing formula for every threshold was defined as the one with the lowest Euclidean distance (=SQRT(SE 2 +RE 2)).Results:Out of 7977 women who met the inclusion criteria, 754 (9.4%) delivered a neonate weighing 3/44000 g, 266 (3.3%) delivered a neonate weighing 3/44250 g and 75 (0.9%) delivered a neonate weighing 3/44500 g. Considerable variability was noted between the accuracy parameters of the different formulas, with Woo's formula integrating Abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) as the most sensitive formula with the highest negative predictive value for all thresholds and Woo's formula using AC, FL and biparietal diameter (BPD) as the most specific for all thresholds. The same formula also demonstrated the best overall accuracy. Regardless of threshold chosen, 80% or more of formulas demonstrated negative systematic error, meaning lower EFW than actual birthweight. As for the Euclidean distance, Hadlock's formula (AC, FL and BPD) ranked the highest for the 4000 and 4250 g thresholds, whereas Shepard's formula (AC and BPD) ranked the highest for the 4500 g threshold.Conclusion:Considerable variability exist between formulas for prediction of neonatal macrosomia. Formulas by Hadlock's and Shepard's utilizing AC, BPD±FL were most accurate for macrosomia prediction at 4000, 4250 and 4500 g thresholds, respectively.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1285-1291
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Issue number12
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017


Dive into the research topics of 'Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance - The prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this