Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Differences in the product characteristics and clinical use of granulocytes for transfusion: The BEST Collaborative study

  • The Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Collaborative
  • NHS Blood and Transplant
  • University of Oxford
  • Héma-Québec
  • Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology
  • Université Laval
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
  • Etablissement français du sang
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • Tata Medical Center
  • Stanford University
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Rabin Medical Center Israel
  • Hospital de Pediatria “Dr. Juan P. Garrahan”
  • New Zealand Blood Service
  • Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
  • Centre de Transfusió I Banc de Teixits
  • Australian Red Cross
  • German Red Cross
  • University of Oldenburg
  • Sanquin Blood Supply Foundation
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Seattle Children's Hospital
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Whether granulocytes for transfusion are beneficial remains uncertain, although some evidence suggests that efficacy may be dose-related. Granulocytes are mostly produced by apheresis procedure, but other means of production are increasingly used. Methods: Centers that produce and/or use granulocytes were recruited through the BEST Collaborative and completed a detailed survey of granulocyte manufacture, specifications, clinical use, operational considerations, and data collection initiatives. Results: Fifteen national, regional, and local producers and/or users of granulocytes were included. Granulocytes were produced from apheresis procedure (n = 10), pooled buffy coats (n = 2), single buffy coats (n = 4) or pooling of residual leukocyte units from whole blood processing (n = 1). The mean adult dose of granulocytes reported was 1.6 to 3.7 × 1010 for apheresis, and 1.8 to 2.2 × 1010 for pooled buffy coat granulocytes. For apheresis procedure donations, donor stimulation included steroids and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Centers providing whole blood-derived granulocytes reported shorter times from request to delivery than those using apheresis procedure products. Indications and product selection criteria were similar. The most frequently reported challenges with granulocytes were donor availability for apheresis procedure (n = 7), short shelf life (n = 5) and lack of evidence of efficacy (n = 5). The cost of one unit of apheresis procedure granulocytes ranged from 568 to 7500 PPP-USD, and for one pooled buffy coat unit was from 2208 to 2822 PPP-USD. Conclusions: We have highlighted differences in granulocyte production that are relevant for the design and interpretation of much needed international clinical studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1111-1123
Number of pages13
JournalTransfusion
Volume65
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • blood
  • buffy coats
  • granulocytes
  • transfusion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in the product characteristics and clinical use of granulocytes for transfusion: The BEST Collaborative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this