Die hard: A blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense - Implications for the control of defensive behavior

David Eilam*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

184 Scopus citations

Abstract

Freezing, fleeing or fighting back are general defensive responses in many taxa. These defenses are mutually exclusive, since a prey cannot simultaneously flee and fight, or freeze and flee. Each of these defenses by itself is rudimentary and probably cannot provide a completely effective means to elude predation. Freezing is efficient only if employed before the prey is spotted by the predator, otherwise the prey becomes a stationary, easy to catch target. In fleeing, the prey can move directly away and maximize its distance from the predator, move toward the predator to confine it to a single clashing point, or dodge sideways to evade the attack. Prey can also run in a straight path that is efficient against slow or distant predators, or in a zigzag path that is efficient when a raptor is close or fast. In all, freezing and fleeing constitute together a complex and flexible defensive response, and are probably controlled by different motor systems that are inter-connected to allow fast switching between these behaviors, as required for an effective and versatile response.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1181-1191
Number of pages11
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume29
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Keywords

  • Aggressive behavior
  • Defensive behavior
  • Fleeing
  • Freezing
  • Orientation
  • Owls
  • Predation risk
  • Risk assessment
  • Spiny mice
  • Voles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Die hard: A blend of freezing and fleeing as a dynamic defense - Implications for the control of defensive behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this