Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy for constipation as the sole indication

E. C. Obusez, L. Lian, R. Kariv, C. A. Burke, B. Shen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Aim There is controversy over whether constipation as the only symptom should be an indication for routine diagnostic colonoscopy. The study was carried out to assess the prevalence of abnormal pathology on colonoscopy and to assess the risk factors for colonic neoplasia in patients with constipation but without 'high risk symptoms'. Method A cross-sectional, single-centre study was conducted on individuals who underwent colonoscopy for constipation as the sole indication between 2005 and 2008. Standardized endoscopic and pathology reports were reviewed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results A total of 786 patients (595 women, 75.7%; mean age, 57.4±13.5years) underwent diagnostic colonoscopy for constipation. Forty-three (5.5%) had polyps, of whom 19 (2.4%) had hyperplastic polyps and 19 (2.4%) adenomas. No cancers were found. In patients with adenoma, the detection rate was 2.9% for patients below age 40years and 1.7% for patients below age 50years. Older age was associated with a polyp in both univariate and multivariate analysis. Gender, ethnicity and smoking were not associated with polyp or adenoma. Conclusion Colonoscopy for patients with constipation as the sole indication had a lower yield of neoplastic lesions than that for patients undergoing routine screening colonoscopy. Colonoscopy in constipation may only be warranted in patients who are over 50years of age.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)585-591
Number of pages7
JournalColorectal Disease
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2012


  • Adenoma
  • Colonoscopy
  • Constipation
  • Endoscopy
  • Polyp


Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic yield of colonoscopy for constipation as the sole indication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this