TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection of Intraorbital Foreign Bodies Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography
AU - Ayalon, Anfisa
AU - Fanadka, Feda
AU - Levov, Dimitry
AU - Saabni, Ramei
AU - Moisseiev, Elad
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: We analyze the detectability of intraorbital foreign bodies (OrbFBs) of various types and sizes using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging using a three-Tesla machine (MRI 3 T). Methods: An ex vivo model of sheep eyes with preserved extraocular muscles and orbital fat tissue placed in the orbital cavity of the human skull was created for this study. Foreign bodies made of four different materials–plastic, bottle glass, stone and wood–each in three different sizes (large, intermediate and small) were inserted into the soft tissue of the orbit in the extraocular space. Each orbit was scanned by CT and MRI. Images were analyzed by a senior radiologist and underwent masked review by three oculoplastic surgeons. Results: Analysis of MRI and CT scans identified distinguishing characteristics for each of the four materials. This information was further integrated into a clinical algorithm. CT allowed easier identification of most of the embedded materials compared to MRI. Smaller OrbFB size was associated with lower detectability. Review of CT yielded 94.4% agreement between oculoplastic specialists in detecting OrbFbs using CT scans and allowed detection of most OrbFBs. In contrast, the overall agreement with MRI was lower: 66.7% with T1 MPRAGE, 50% with T1TSE, 88.9% with T2 TSE and 72.2% with T2 TSE FS. Plastic was the most difficult material to detect in all size categories. Conclusions: CT offers a clear advantage over MRI for detecting and localizing nonmetallic OrbFBs of all sizes, except for plastic. Plastic OrbFBs can be detected with CT depending on size but are more visible in MRI scans.
AB - Purpose: We analyze the detectability of intraorbital foreign bodies (OrbFBs) of various types and sizes using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging using a three-Tesla machine (MRI 3 T). Methods: An ex vivo model of sheep eyes with preserved extraocular muscles and orbital fat tissue placed in the orbital cavity of the human skull was created for this study. Foreign bodies made of four different materials–plastic, bottle glass, stone and wood–each in three different sizes (large, intermediate and small) were inserted into the soft tissue of the orbit in the extraocular space. Each orbit was scanned by CT and MRI. Images were analyzed by a senior radiologist and underwent masked review by three oculoplastic surgeons. Results: Analysis of MRI and CT scans identified distinguishing characteristics for each of the four materials. This information was further integrated into a clinical algorithm. CT allowed easier identification of most of the embedded materials compared to MRI. Smaller OrbFB size was associated with lower detectability. Review of CT yielded 94.4% agreement between oculoplastic specialists in detecting OrbFbs using CT scans and allowed detection of most OrbFBs. In contrast, the overall agreement with MRI was lower: 66.7% with T1 MPRAGE, 50% with T1TSE, 88.9% with T2 TSE and 72.2% with T2 TSE FS. Plastic was the most difficult material to detect in all size categories. Conclusions: CT offers a clear advantage over MRI for detecting and localizing nonmetallic OrbFBs of all sizes, except for plastic. Plastic OrbFBs can be detected with CT depending on size but are more visible in MRI scans.
KW - Intraorbital foreign body
KW - computed tomography
KW - magnetic resonance imaging
KW - nonmetallic foreign body
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111888785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02713683.2021.1945108
DO - 10.1080/02713683.2021.1945108
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 34325598
AN - SCOPUS:85111888785
SN - 0271-3683
VL - 46
SP - 1917
EP - 1922
JO - Current Eye Research
JF - Current Eye Research
IS - 12
ER -