Depth from Defocus vs. stereo: How different really are they?

Yoav Y. Schechner, Nahum Kiryati

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Depth from Focus (DFF) and Depth from Defocus (DFD) methods are theoretically unified with the geometric triangulation principle. Fundamentally, the depth sensitivities of DFF and DFD are not different than those of stereo (or motion) based systems having the same physical dimensions. Contrary to common belief, DFD does not inherently avoid the matching (correspondence) problem. Basically, DFD and DFF do not avoid the occlusion problem any more than triangulation techniques, but they are more stable in the presence of such disruptions. The fundamental advantage of DFF and DFD methods is the two-dimensionality of the aperture, allowing more robust estimation. We analyze the effect of noise in different spatial frequencies, and derive the optimal changes of the focus settings in DFD. These results elucidate the limitations of methods based on depth of field and provide a foundation for fair performance comparison between DFF/DFD and shape from stereo (or motion) algorithms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-162
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Computer Vision
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Depth from Defocus vs. stereo: How different really are they?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this