Demonic Deuteronomy? The Ending of Deuteronomy and the Sectarian Debate

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The article discusses the reception of Deuteronomy at the height of the Second Temple period, especially poetic sections in chapters 32 and 33 that depict YHWH and multiplicity in the divine realm. Some of these multiple minor divinities are considered as gods and others as demons. Apocalyptic circles like the Qumran yaḥad endorsed such multiplicity as part of their faith, and hence preferred the biblical variants that promote it. They conceived the end of Deuteronomy as an angelological proof text. In contrast, Sadducean objection to this worldview is expressed in a passage from the Book of Acts. The article thus contextualizes textual criticism in the social history of the Second Temple period.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Textual History of the Bible from the Dead Sea Scrolls to the Biblical Manuscripts of the Vienna Papyrus Collection
Subtitle of host publicationProceedings of the Fifteenth International Symposium of the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature, Cosponsored by the University of Vienna Institute for Jewish Studies and the Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies
EditorsRuth A. Clements, Russell Fuller, Armin Lange, Paul D. Mandel
Place of PublicationLeiden, The Netherlands
PublisherBrill
Chapter8
Pages253–284
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9789004511705
ISBN (Print)9789004504622
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Publication series

NameStudies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah
Volume137
ISSN (Print)0169-9962
ISSN (Electronic)2588-9982

RAMBI Publications

  • rambi
  • Bible -- Deuteronomy -- XXXII-XXXIII -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
  • Bible -- Deuteronomy -- Appreciation
  • Dead Sea scrolls -- Criticism, interpretation, etc
  • Angels in the Bible

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Demonic Deuteronomy? The Ending of Deuteronomy and the Sectarian Debate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this