TY - JOUR
T1 - Delivery outcomes of large-for-gestational-age newborns stratified by the presence or absence of gestational diabetes mellitus
AU - Rosen, Hadar
AU - Shmueli, Anat
AU - Ashwal, Eran
AU - Hiersch, Liran
AU - Yogev, Yariv
AU - Aviram, Amir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - Objective: To evaluate separate and combined contributions of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) on delivery outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of term singleton deliveries between 2007 and 2014 in Tel Aviv, Israel, outcomes were compared between non-GDM/AGA pregnancies (reference) and three study groups: non-GDM/LGA, GDM/appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and GDM/LGA. Results: Overall, there were 62 102 deliveries, of which 53 201 (85.7%) were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 43 775 (82.3%) were non-GDM/AGA, 6441 (12.1%) non-GDM/LGA, 2351 (4.4%) GDM/AGA, and 634 (1.2%) GDM/LGA. Compared with the reference group, the study groups had higher mean maternal age and higher rates of previous cesarean delivery, polyhydramnios, induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Considering only women attempting vaginal delivery, the three groups were independently associated with adverse outcomes including cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.5, 1.6, and 2.6 for non-GDM/LGA, GDM/AGA, and GDM/LGA, respectively), mainly for prolonged first stage of labor, and hypoglycemia (aOR, 1.9, 2.5, and 4.6, respectively). LGA with and without GDM was associated with shoulder dystocia (aOR, 14.5 and 6.9, respectively), prolonged second stage, and jaundice. Conclusion: GDM and LGA share similarities in pregnancy complications. The presence of both has a cumulative impact.
AB - Objective: To evaluate separate and combined contributions of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and large-for-gestational age (LGA) on delivery outcomes. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study of term singleton deliveries between 2007 and 2014 in Tel Aviv, Israel, outcomes were compared between non-GDM/AGA pregnancies (reference) and three study groups: non-GDM/LGA, GDM/appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and GDM/LGA. Results: Overall, there were 62 102 deliveries, of which 53 201 (85.7%) were eligible for inclusion. Of these, 43 775 (82.3%) were non-GDM/AGA, 6441 (12.1%) non-GDM/LGA, 2351 (4.4%) GDM/AGA, and 634 (1.2%) GDM/LGA. Compared with the reference group, the study groups had higher mean maternal age and higher rates of previous cesarean delivery, polyhydramnios, induction of labor, and cesarean delivery. Considering only women attempting vaginal delivery, the three groups were independently associated with adverse outcomes including cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.5, 1.6, and 2.6 for non-GDM/LGA, GDM/AGA, and GDM/LGA, respectively), mainly for prolonged first stage of labor, and hypoglycemia (aOR, 1.9, 2.5, and 4.6, respectively). LGA with and without GDM was associated with shoulder dystocia (aOR, 14.5 and 6.9, respectively), prolonged second stage, and jaundice. Conclusion: GDM and LGA share similarities in pregnancy complications. The presence of both has a cumulative impact.
KW - Gestational diabetes mellitus
KW - Large for gestational age
KW - Perinatal outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043277764&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.12387
DO - 10.1002/ijgo.12387
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 29139556
AN - SCOPUS:85043277764
SN - 0020-7292
VL - 141
SP - 120
EP - 125
JO - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
JF - International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics
IS - 1
ER -