Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavours prior to compound conditioning

L. G. De La Casa*, R. E. Lubow

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

A number of recent conditioned taste aversion (CTA) experiments have demonstrated a super-latent inhibition (LI) effect - namely, a time-induced increase in the effects of stimulus preexposure when the interval between acquisition and test is spent in a context that is different from the other experimental contexts. Two CTA experiments with rats were conducted to examine the role of primacy in producing super-LI. In Experiment 1, one of two flavours was preexposed, following which a second flavour was preexposed. After the second preexposure, animals were conditioned by pairing a compound of the two preexposed flavours with LiCl. The test stage was conducted 1 or 21 days after conditioning, with the interval being spent in either the same or different contexts. In the test, animals were confronted with two bottles, each with one of the two preexposed flavours. Super-LI was obtained only for the first preexposed flavour in the 21-day delay group that spent the interval in a different context. Experiment 2 was designed to ensure that the effects in Experiment 1 represented LI, and to control for order of presentation of the flavours and time between preexposure and acquisition. The results replicated those of Experiment 1. The two experiments support the importance of primacy in the general super-LI experiment where CS-alone preexposure precedes CS-US.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section B: Comparative and Physiological Psychology
Volume58
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavours prior to compound conditioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this