Default Sarcastic Interpretations: On the Priority of Nonsalient Interpretations

Rachel Giora*, Ari Drucker, Ofer Fein, Itamar Mendelson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Findings from five experiments support the view that negation generates sarcastic utterance-interpretations by default.1 When presented in isolation, novel negative constructions (“Punctuality is not his forte,” “Thoroughness is not her most distinctive feature”), free of semantic anomaly or internal incongruity, were interpreted sarcastically and rated as sarcastic compared to their novel affirmative counterparts (Experiments 1 and 3). In strongly supportive contexts, they were processed faster when biased toward their noncoded (nonsalient) sarcastic interpretation than toward their noncoded but (salience-based) literal interpretation (Experiments 2 and 4). Experiment 5 reduces the possibility that it is structural markedness rather than negation that prompts nonliteralness. Such findings, attesting to the priority of sarcastic interpretations, are unaccountable by any contemporary processing model, including the Graded Salience Hypothesis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-200
Number of pages28
JournalDiscourse Processes
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 3 Apr 2015

Funding

FundersFunder number
Israel Science Foundation436/12

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Default Sarcastic Interpretations: On the Priority of Nonsalient Interpretations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this