Decomposing Arrangements of Hyperplanes: VC-Dimension, Combinatorial Dimension, and Point Location

Esther Ezra*, Sariel Har-Peled, Haim Kaplan, Micha Sharir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This work is motivated by several basic problems and techniques that rely on space decomposition of arrangements of hyperplanes in high-dimensional spaces, most notably Meiser’s 1993 algorithm (Meiser in Inf Comput 106(2):286–303, 1993) for point location in such arrangements. A standard approach to these problems is via random sampling, in which one draws a random sample of the hyperplanes, constructs a suitable decomposition of its arrangement, and recurses within each cell of the decomposition with the subset of hyperplanes that cross the cell. The efficiency of the resulting algorithm depends on the quality of the sample, which is controlled by various parameters. One of these parameters is the classical VC-dimension, and its associated primal shatter dimension, of a suitably defined corresponding range space. Another parameter, which we refer to here as the combinatorial dimension, is the maximum number of hyperplanes that are needed to define a cell that can arise in the decomposition of some sample of the input hyperplanes; this parameter arises in Clarkson’s (and later Clarkson and Shor’s) random sampling technique. We re-examine these parameters for the two main space decomposition techniques—bottom-vertex triangulation, and vertical decomposition, including their explicit dependence on the dimension d, and discover several unexpected phenomena, which show that, in both techniques, there are large gaps between the VC-dimension (and primal shatter dimension), and the combinatorial dimension. Our main application is to point location in an arrangement of n hyperplanes is Rd, in which we show that the query cost in Meiser’s algorithm can be improved if one uses vertical decomposition instead of bottom-vertex triangulation, at the cost of some increase in the preprocessing cost and storage (which seem to be stated incorrectly, and are not worked out, in Meiser’s work). Our improved bounds rely on establishing several new structural properties and improved complexity bounds for vertical decomposition, which are of independent interest, and which we expect to find additional applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-173
Number of pages65
JournalDiscrete and Computational Geometry
Volume64
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • Bottom-vertex triangulation
  • Epsilon-cuttings
  • Point-location
  • Random sampling
  • VC-dimension
  • Vertical decomposition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decomposing Arrangements of Hyperplanes: VC-Dimension, Combinatorial Dimension, and Point Location'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this