Davidson's Interpretations: The Step Not Taken

Eli Dresner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the first section of this paper I follow an important trajectory in the development of Davidson's notion of radical interpretation: From being interpretationally concerned only with language, like Quine's radical translation that precedes it, through involving the ascription of belief in increasingly complex ways, to finally incorporating desire and preference. In the second section of the paper I show that Davidson falls short of incorporating non-linguistic action in radical interpretation, I assess his motivations for doing so, and I criticize these motivations. In the third and final section I propose a unified interpretation scheme for language, action and mind.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)698-712
Number of pages15
JournalNous
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Davidson's Interpretations: The Step Not Taken'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this