TY - JOUR
T1 - Cytomegalovirus-negative kidney transplant recipients are at an increased risk for malignancy after kidney transplantation
AU - Rozen-Zvi, Benaya
AU - Lichtenberg, Shelly
AU - Green, Hefziba
AU - Cohen, Ori
AU - Chagnac, Avry
AU - Mor, Eytan
AU - Rahamimov, Ruth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Background: The effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology status on malignancy risk in kidney transplanted patients is not clear yet. Methods: In a nested case–control study, CMV serology status was compared between patients with a malignancy and 2:1 matched control patients without a malignancy. In a cohort study, the hazard of malignancy was compared between patients that were CMV-negative but had a CMV-positive donor and other patients, using Cox analysis. Results: Fifty-two of 599 patients transplanted in our center between 2001 and 2014 developed a malignancy. Nine (17.3%) of the 52 patients that developed cancer were CMV-negative but had a-CMV-positive donor compared with 6 (5.8%) of the 104 matched control patients (odd ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–10.2, P=.021). By univariate Cox model, there was a trend toward increased cancer risk in CMV-negative patients with a positive donor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95, 95% CI 0.95–4.0, P=.07), but after adjusting for multiple covariates, CMV-negative status was significantly associated with increased risk of cancer (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.23–5.26; P=.012). Conclusions: CMV-negative patients that had a CMV-positive donor were found to have a higher risk of malignancy after kidney transplantation.
AB - Background: The effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serology status on malignancy risk in kidney transplanted patients is not clear yet. Methods: In a nested case–control study, CMV serology status was compared between patients with a malignancy and 2:1 matched control patients without a malignancy. In a cohort study, the hazard of malignancy was compared between patients that were CMV-negative but had a CMV-positive donor and other patients, using Cox analysis. Results: Fifty-two of 599 patients transplanted in our center between 2001 and 2014 developed a malignancy. Nine (17.3%) of the 52 patients that developed cancer were CMV-negative but had a-CMV-positive donor compared with 6 (5.8%) of the 104 matched control patients (odd ratio 3.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–10.2, P=.021). By univariate Cox model, there was a trend toward increased cancer risk in CMV-negative patients with a positive donor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.95, 95% CI 0.95–4.0, P=.07), but after adjusting for multiple covariates, CMV-negative status was significantly associated with increased risk of cancer (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.23–5.26; P=.012). Conclusions: CMV-negative patients that had a CMV-positive donor were found to have a higher risk of malignancy after kidney transplantation.
KW - cytomegalovirus
KW - kidney transplantation
KW - malignancy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985897996&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ctr.12775
DO - 10.1111/ctr.12775
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
AN - SCOPUS:84985897996
SN - 0902-0063
VL - 30
SP - 980
EP - 985
JO - Clinical Transplantation
JF - Clinical Transplantation
IS - 9
ER -