TY - JOUR
T1 - Current laboratory and clinical practices in reporting and interpreting anti-nuclear antibody indirect immunofluorescence (ANA IIF) patterns
T2 - results of an international survey
AU - Van Hoovels, Lieve
AU - Broeders, Sylvia
AU - Chan, Edward K.L.
AU - Andrade, Luis
AU - de Melo Cruvinel, Wilson
AU - Damoiseaux, Jan
AU - Viander, Markku
AU - Herold, Manfred
AU - Coucke, Wim
AU - Heijnen, Ingmar
AU - Bogdanos, Dimitrios
AU - Calvo-Alén, Jaime
AU - Eriksson, Catharina
AU - Kozmar, Ana
AU - Kuhi, Liisa
AU - Bonroy, Carolien
AU - Lauwerys, Bernard
AU - Schouwers, Sofie
AU - Lutteri, Laurence
AU - Vercammen, Martine
AU - Mayer, Miroslav
AU - Patel, Dina
AU - Egner, William
AU - Puolakka, Kari
AU - Tesija-Kuna, Andrea
AU - Shoenfeld, Yehuda
AU - de Sousa, Maria José Rego
AU - Hoyos, Marcos Lopez
AU - Radice, Antonella
AU - Bossuyt, Xavier
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Background: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. Methods: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. Results: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. Conclusion: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.
AB - Background: The International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody (ANA) Patterns (ICAP) has recently proposed nomenclature in order to harmonize ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) pattern reporting. ICAP distinguishes competent-level from expert-level patterns. A survey was organized to evaluate reporting, familiarity, and considered clinical value of ANA IIF patterns. Methods: Two surveys were distributed by European Autoimmunity Standardization Initiative (EASI) working groups, the International Consensus on ANA Patterns (ICAP) and UK NEQAS to laboratory professionals and clinicians. Results: 438 laboratory professionals and 248 clinicians from 67 countries responded. Except for dense fine speckled (DFS), the nuclear competent patterns were reported by > 85% of the laboratories. Except for rods and rings, the cytoplasmic competent patterns were reported by > 72% of laboratories. Cytoplasmic IIF staining was considered ANA positive by 55% of clinicians and 62% of laboratory professionals, with geographical and expertise-related differences. Quantification of fluorescence intensity was considered clinically relevant for nuclear patterns, but less so for cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns. Combining IIF with specific extractable nuclear antigens (ENA)/dsDNA antibody testing was considered most informative. Of the nuclear competent patterns, the centromere and homogeneous pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the DFS pattern the lowest. Of the cytoplasmic patterns, the reticular/mitochondria-like pattern obtained the highest scores for clinical relevance and the polar/Golgi-like and rods and rings patterns the lowest. Conclusion: This survey confirms that the major nuclear and cytoplasmic ANA IIF patterns are considered clinically important. There is no unanimity on classifying DFS, rods and rings and polar/Golgi-like as a competent pattern and on reporting cytoplasmic patterns as ANA IIF positive.
KW - ANA patterns
KW - Antinuclear antibodies
KW - ICAP
KW - Indirect immunofluorescence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096377894&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
DO - 10.1186/s13317-020-00139-9
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 33228811
AN - SCOPUS:85096377894
SN - 2038-0305
VL - 11
JO - Autoimmunity Highlights
JF - Autoimmunity Highlights
IS - 1
M1 - 17
ER -