TY - JOUR
T1 - Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding
AU - Wolpe, Noham
AU - Haggard, Patrick
AU - Siebner, Hartwig R.
AU - Rowe, James B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments We thank Etienne Gaudrain, Bob Carlyon and John Deeks for their technical help. The work was funded by the James S McDonnell Foundation, the Wellcome Trust (088324), the Medical Research Council (MC_US_A060_0016) and the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research center. NW was funded by a Gates Cambridge scholarship and the Raymond and Beverley Sackler foundation. HRS was supported by a Grant of Excellence sponsored by The Lundbeck Foundation Mapping, Modulation & Modeling the Control of Actions (ContAct) [R59 A5399].
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - 'Intentional binding' describes the perceived temporal attraction between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence. Binding has been used in health and disease as an indirect measure of awareness of action or agency, that is, the sense that one controls one's own actions. It has been proposed that binding results from cue integration, in which a voluntary action provides information about the timing of its consequences or vice versa. The perception of the timing of either event is then a weighted average, determined according to the reliability of each of these two cues. Here we tested the contribution of cue integration to the perception of action and its sensory effect in binding, that is, action and tone binding, by manipulating the sensory reliability of the outcome tone. As predicted, when tone reliability was reduced, action binding was diminished and tone binding was increased. However, further analyses showed that cue integration accounted for changes in action binding, but not tone binding. These findings establish a role for cue integration in action binding and support the growing evidence suggesting that action and tone binding are, at least in part, driven by distinct mechanisms.
AB - 'Intentional binding' describes the perceived temporal attraction between a voluntary action and its sensory consequence. Binding has been used in health and disease as an indirect measure of awareness of action or agency, that is, the sense that one controls one's own actions. It has been proposed that binding results from cue integration, in which a voluntary action provides information about the timing of its consequences or vice versa. The perception of the timing of either event is then a weighted average, determined according to the reliability of each of these two cues. Here we tested the contribution of cue integration to the perception of action and its sensory effect in binding, that is, action and tone binding, by manipulating the sensory reliability of the outcome tone. As predicted, when tone reliability was reduced, action binding was diminished and tone binding was increased. However, further analyses showed that cue integration accounted for changes in action binding, but not tone binding. These findings establish a role for cue integration in action binding and support the growing evidence suggesting that action and tone binding are, at least in part, driven by distinct mechanisms.
KW - Agency
KW - Cue integration
KW - Intentional binding
KW - Perception of action
KW - Volition
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84892786748
U2 - 10.1007/s00221-013-3419-2
DO - 10.1007/s00221-013-3419-2
M3 - ???researchoutput.researchoutputtypes.contributiontojournal.article???
C2 - 23371752
AN - SCOPUS:84892786748
SN - 0014-4819
VL - 229
SP - 467
EP - 474
JO - Experimental Brain Research
JF - Experimental Brain Research
IS - 3
ER -