COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES): Analysis of the impact of confinement in eating disorders and obesity—A collaborative international study

Fernando Fernández-Aranda*, Lucero Munguía, Gemma Mestre-Bach, Trevor Steward, Mikel Etxandi, Isabel Baenas, Roser Granero, Isabel Sánchez, Emilio Ortega, Alba Andreu, Violeta L. Moize, Jose M. Fernández-Real, Francisco J. Tinahones, Carlos Diegüez, Gema Frühbeck, Daniel Le Grange, Kate Tchanturia, Andreas Karwautz, Michael Zeiler, Angela FavaroLaurence Claes, Koen Luyckx, Ia Shekriladze, Eduardo Serrano-Troncoso, Teresa Rangil, Maria Eulalia Loran Meler, Jose Soriano-Pacheco, Mar Carceller-Sindreu, Sara Bujalance-Arguijo, Meritxell Lozano, Raquel Linares, Carlota Gudiol, Jordi Carratala, Jessica Sanchez-Gonzalez, Paulo P.P. Machado, Anders Håkansson, Ferenc Túry, Bea Pászthy, Daniel Stein, Hana Papezová, Brigita Bax, Mikhail F. Borisenkov, Sergey V. Popov, Youl Ri Kim, Michiko Nakazato, Nathalie Godart, Robert van Voren, Tetiana Ilnytska, Jue Chen, Katie Rowlands, Janet Treasure, Susana Jiménez-Murcia

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

61 Scopus citations

Abstract

Confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have a serious and complex impact on the mental health of patients with an eating disorder (ED) and of patients with obesity. The present manuscript has the following aims: (1) to analyse the psychometric properties of the COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES), (2) to explore changes that occurred due to confinement in eating symptomatology; and (3) to explore the general acceptation of the use of telemedicine during confinement. The sample comprised 121 participants (87 ED patients and 34 patients with obesity) recruited from six different centres. Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) tested the rational-theoretical structure of the CIES. Adequate goodness-of-fit was obtained for the confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach alpha values ranged from good to excellent. Regarding the effects of confinement, positive and negative impacts of the confinement depends of the eating disorder subtype. Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) and with obesity endorsed a positive response to treatment during confinement, no significant changes were found in bulimia nervosa (BN) patients, whereas Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder (OSFED) patients endorsed an increase in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology. Furthermore, AN patients expressed the greatest dissatisfaction and accommodation difficulty with remote therapy when compared with the previously provided face-to-face therapy. The present study provides empirical evidence on the psychometric robustness of the CIES tool and shows that a negative confinement impact was associated with ED subtype, whereas OSFED patients showed the highest impairment in eating symptomatology and in psychopathology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-883
Number of pages13
JournalEuropean Eating Disorders Review
Volume28
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2020
Externally publishedYes

Funding

FundersFunder number
FUNCIVA
Fondo Investigación Sanitario‐ FIS
Mexican institution Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnolog?a
Mexican institution Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Fundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaPOCI‐01‐0145‐FEDER‐028145
Generalitat de Catalunya
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Ministerio de Economía y CompetitividadPSI2015‐68701‐R
Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIPI17/01167, INT19/00046
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
European Regional Development Fund
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red-Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas

    Keywords

    • COVID Isolation Eating Scale
    • COVID-19
    • eating disorders
    • obesity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'COVID Isolation Eating Scale (CIES): Analysis of the impact of confinement in eating disorders and obesity—A collaborative international study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this