Cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasties: Technology assessment of surgical procedures by mailed questionnaires

Uri Givon, Gary M. Ginsberg, Henri Horoszowski, Joshua Shemer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A retrospective study comparing 700 consecutive total hip arthroplasties, utilizing four types of implants, was performed. Questionnaires based on hip scores were sent to 593 living patients. Useful responses were received from 363 (61%) patients. Hip scores and quality- adjusted life-years were calculated. Multiple regression analysis, controlling for all possible biases, demonstrated one cementless implants as superior to all others. We believe that the use of mailed questionnaires is a simple and convenient system of follow-up, saving patients the need for outpatient clinic visits. The validity of such replies, however, has yet to be established.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)735-742
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998

Keywords

  • Cost-utility
  • Technology Assessment
  • Total Hip Arthroplasty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost-utility analysis of total hip arthroplasties: Technology assessment of surgical procedures by mailed questionnaires'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this