Corrigendum to ‘Ovarian function 6 years after cryopreservation and transplantation of whole sheep ovaries’ (Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2010) 20(1) (48–52) (S147264830900162X) (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.019))

A. Arav*, Z. Gavish, A. Elami, Y. Natan, A. Revel, S. Silber, R. G. Gosden, P. Patrizio

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The authors regret that the figure legend for Figure 3 is incorrect. The published legend reads: Haematoxylin- and eosin-stained ovarian sections (ovary from sheep no. 1) revealing normal tissue architecture including follicles at various developmental stages. Arrows pointing at: (a) primary follicle (×20, bar = 50 µm); (b and c) antral follicles (×10, bar = 100 µm); and (d) corpus luteum (×5, bar = 100 µm). However, the legend should appear as: Haematoxylin and eosin stained ovarian sections (ovary from sheep no. 1) revealing normal tissue architecture including follicles at various development stages. Arrows pointing at: (a) primary follicle (×20, bar = 50 µm) : (b and c) antral follicles (×10, bar = 100 µm); and (d) follicule cavity (×5, bar = 100 µm).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)751
Number of pages1
JournalReproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume35
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to ‘Ovarian function 6 years after cryopreservation and transplantation of whole sheep ovaries’ (Reproductive BioMedicine Online (2010) 20(1) (48–52) (S147264830900162X) (10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.019))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this