In the original article, there were inconsistencies when comparing one by one the panels of Figure 4A in the main text and the representative extended immunoblot results in Supplementary Figure S3, as published. Thus, some of the representative images in the main text were unfortunately represented by extended mirrored, duplicated and rotated blots as explained below. It should be emphasized that for scientific rigor and data corroboration, each experiment was performed in triplicates and repeated three times and each immunoblot was exposed at least three times (three films), hence, the blot shown as a full image in the original supplementary material is a representative picture, as specifically stated in the original Supplementary Figure S3 legend. To maintain scientific rigor, there were 36 blots and almost 100 films. Our mistakes, corrected below, stem from an unfortunate mix-up coupled with an extremely high similarity between all repetitive experiments, we apologize for the mistakes. Corrections have beenmade to Figure 4, panel A, and Supplementary Figure S3. The corrected figures are shown below. The authors apologize for these errors and state that they do not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated. (Figure presented.).